React.js Boilerplate vs Underscore

Overview

Underscore

Stacks1.9K

Followers589

Votes290

GitHub Stars27.4K

Forks5.5K

React.js Boilerplate

Stacks403

Followers464

Votes18

React.js Boilerplate vs Underscore: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the world of web development, React.js Boilerplate and Underscore are two popular tools that help developers streamline their development process. While both serve different purposes, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. **Architecture**: React.js Boilerplate provides a complete set of tools and best practices for building React applications, including a solid foundation for structuring code and managing dependencies. On the other hand, Underscore is a utility library that provides a range of functions to manipulate and work with arrays, objects, and functions in JavaScript.

2. **Purpose**: React.js Boilerplate is focused on enhancing the development experience for React applications by providing a standardized project structure and development environment. In contrast, Underscore is more specific in its purpose, offering a set of functions that help developers work with data more efficiently and succinctly.

3. **Technology stack**: React.js Boilerplate is built on top of popular technologies such as React, Redux, Webpack, and Babel, making it a comprehensive and modern solution for building complex web applications. Underscore, on the other hand, is a standalone library that can be used alongside any JavaScript framework or library.

4. **Scope**: React.js Boilerplate addresses the broader aspects of building and maintaining a React application, including development, testing, and deployment. On the other hand, Underscore is primarily focused on providing utility functions for data manipulation and manipulation in JavaScript.

5. **Community support**: React.js Boilerplate has a strong community of developers and contributors who actively maintain and enhance the project, providing support and updates for the latest versions of React and related technologies. While Underscore also has a dedicated user base, it may not have the same level of community support and regular updates as React.js Boilerplate.

6. **Ease of Use**: React.js Boilerplate aims to simplify the setup and configuration of a React project by providing a ready-to-use template with all the necessary tools and configurations. Underscore, on the other hand, requires manual installation and integration into existing projects, which may require additional setup and configuration.

In Summary, React.js Boilerplate and Underscore differ in architecture, purpose, technology stack, scope, community support, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Underscore, React.js Boilerplate

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Underscore	React.js Boilerplate
A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.	Quick setup for new performance orientated, offline–first React.js applications featuring Redux, hot–reloading, PostCSS, react-router, ServiceWorker, AppCache, FontFaceObserver and Mocha.
-	Using react-transform-hmr, your changes in the CSS and JS get reflected in the app instantly without refreshing the page. That means that the current application state persists even when you change something in the underlying code! For a very good explanation and demo, watch Dan Abramov himself talking about it at react-europe.;Redux is a much better implementation of a flux–like, unidirectional data flow. Redux makes actions composable, reduces the boilerplate code and makes hot–reloading possible in the first place. For a good overview of redux, check out the talk linked above or the official documentation!;Babel is a modular JavaScript transpiler that helps to use next generation JavaScript and more, like transformation for JSX, hot loading, error catching etc. Babel has a solid ecosystem of offical preset and plugins.;PostCSS is like Sass, but modular and capable of much more. PostCSS is, in essence, just a wrapper for plugins which exposes an easy to use, but very powerful API. While it is possible to replicate Sass features with PostCSS, PostCSS has an ecosystem of amazing plugins with functionalities Sass cannot even dream about having. See this talk for a short introduction to PostCSS.;Unit tests should be an important part of every web application developers toolchain. Mocha checks your application is working exactly how it should without you lifting a single finger. Congratulations, you just won a First Class ticket to world domination, fasten your seat belt please!;react-router is used for routing in this boilerplate. Using the new, and currently unreleased, 1.0 version, react-router makes routing really easy to do and takes care of a lot of the work. Since the version is not officially out yet, the documentation is not fully finished, but by far finished enough to work for most needs.;ServiceWorker and AppCache make it possible to use your application offline. As soon as the website has been opened once, it is cached and available without a network connection. See this talk for an explanation of the ServiceWorker used in this boilerplate. manifest.json is specifically for Chrome on Android. Users can add the website to the homescreen and use it like a native app!
Statistics
GitHub Stars 27.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 403
Followers 589	Followers 464
Votes 290	Votes 18
Pros & Cons
Pros 85 Utility 55 Simple 40 Functional programming 32 Fast 28 Open source	Pros 4 Amazing developer experience 4 Nice tooling 3 Easy offline first applications 3 Great documentation 3 Easy setup
Integrations
No integrations available	React Mocha React Router Redux PostCSS

What are some alternatives to Underscore, React.js Boilerplate?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

React.js Boilerplate vs Underscore: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In the world of web development, React.js Boilerplate and Underscore are two popular tools that help developers streamline their development process. While both serve different purposes, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. **Architecture**: React.js Boilerplate provides a complete set of tools and best practices for building React applications, including a solid foundation for structuring code and managing dependencies. On the other hand, Underscore is a utility library that provides a range of functions to manipulate and work with arrays, objects, and functions in JavaScript.

2. **Purpose**: React.js Boilerplate is focused on enhancing the development experience for React applications by providing a standardized project structure and development environment. In contrast, Underscore is more specific in its purpose, offering a set of functions that help developers work with data more efficiently and succinctly.

3. **Technology stack**: React.js Boilerplate is built on top of popular technologies such as React, Redux, Webpack, and Babel, making it a comprehensive and modern solution for building complex web applications. Underscore, on the other hand, is a standalone library that can be used alongside any JavaScript framework or library.

4. **Scope**: React.js Boilerplate addresses the broader aspects of building and maintaining a React application, including development, testing, and deployment. On the other hand, Underscore is primarily focused on providing utility functions for data manipulation and manipulation in JavaScript.

5. **Community support**: React.js Boilerplate has a strong community of developers and contributors who actively maintain and enhance the project, providing support and updates for the latest versions of React and related technologies. While Underscore also has a dedicated user base, it may not have the same level of community support and regular updates as React.js Boilerplate.

6. **Ease of Use**: React.js Boilerplate aims to simplify the setup and configuration of a React project by providing a ready-to-use template with all the necessary tools and configurations. Underscore, on the other hand, requires manual installation and integration into existing projects, which may require additional setup and configuration.

In Summary, React.js Boilerplate and Underscore differ in architecture, purpose, technology stack, scope, community support, and ease of use.

React.js Boilerplate vs Underscore

Overview