Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
RavenDB vs Redis: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Data Structure: RavenDB is a document-oriented database that stores data in JSON format, allowing for complex data models with nested objects and arrays. Redis, on the other hand, is an in-memory data structure store that supports various data structures like strings, lists, sets, and more, making it ideal for caching and real-time applications.
Persistence: RavenDB offers both in-memory and persistent storage options, allowing data to be stored on disk for durability. In contrast, Redis primarily operates in memory, with the option to persist data to disk in a less efficient manner, making it more suitable for use cases where data loss is acceptable.
Querying: RavenDB features a powerful query engine that supports LINQ queries and full-text search capabilities, making it suitable for complex querying requirements. Redis, on the other hand, has limited querying capabilities, primarily supporting key-based lookups and basic operations, making it more suitable for simple data retrieval tasks.
Scaling: RavenDB provides built-in support for horizontal scaling through sharding and replication, allowing for seamless distribution of data across multiple nodes for improved performance and fault tolerance. Redis also supports sharding and replication for scalability but lacks the built-in support for automatic failover and clustering found in RavenDB.
ACID Compliance: RavenDB follows ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, ensuring data integrity and reliability in transactions. On the other hand, Redis prioritizes performance over full ACID compliance, offering eventual consistency and limited transactional support, making it more suitable for use cases where speed is critical.
Use Cases: RavenDB is well-suited for applications requiring complex data structures, advanced querying capabilities, and strict consistency requirements. In contrast, Redis excels in high-performance scenarios like caching, session storage, real-time analytics, and pub/sub messaging due to its in-memory nature and support for various data structures.
In Summary, RavenDB and Redis differ in terms of data structure support, persistence mechanisms, querying capabilities, scalability options, ACID compliance, and ideal use cases.
Pros of RavenDB
- Embedded Library4
- Easy of use3
- NoSql2
Pros of Redis
- Performance886
- Super fast542
- Ease of use513
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable164
- Free155
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Great community22
- Pub/Sub22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- NoSQL10
- Lists10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Bitmaps8
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Open Source7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Transactions4
- Outstanding performance4
- Runs server side LUA4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- Networked4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Scalable2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of RavenDB
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1