Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

RavenDB

73
82
+ 1
9
Redis

59.1K
45.4K
+ 1
3.9K
Add tool

RavenDB vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction:

  1. Data Structure: RavenDB is a document-oriented database that stores data in JSON format, allowing for complex data models with nested objects and arrays. Redis, on the other hand, is an in-memory data structure store that supports various data structures like strings, lists, sets, and more, making it ideal for caching and real-time applications.

  2. Persistence: RavenDB offers both in-memory and persistent storage options, allowing data to be stored on disk for durability. In contrast, Redis primarily operates in memory, with the option to persist data to disk in a less efficient manner, making it more suitable for use cases where data loss is acceptable.

  3. Querying: RavenDB features a powerful query engine that supports LINQ queries and full-text search capabilities, making it suitable for complex querying requirements. Redis, on the other hand, has limited querying capabilities, primarily supporting key-based lookups and basic operations, making it more suitable for simple data retrieval tasks.

  4. Scaling: RavenDB provides built-in support for horizontal scaling through sharding and replication, allowing for seamless distribution of data across multiple nodes for improved performance and fault tolerance. Redis also supports sharding and replication for scalability but lacks the built-in support for automatic failover and clustering found in RavenDB.

  5. ACID Compliance: RavenDB follows ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, ensuring data integrity and reliability in transactions. On the other hand, Redis prioritizes performance over full ACID compliance, offering eventual consistency and limited transactional support, making it more suitable for use cases where speed is critical.

  6. Use Cases: RavenDB is well-suited for applications requiring complex data structures, advanced querying capabilities, and strict consistency requirements. In contrast, Redis excels in high-performance scenarios like caching, session storage, real-time analytics, and pub/sub messaging due to its in-memory nature and support for various data structures.

In Summary, RavenDB and Redis differ in terms of data structure support, persistence mechanisms, querying capabilities, scalability options, ACID compliance, and ideal use cases.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of RavenDB
Pros of Redis
  • 4
    Embedded Library
  • 3
    Easy of use
  • 2
    NoSql
  • 886
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 513
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
  • 194
    Open source
  • 182
    Easy to deploy
  • 164
    Stable
  • 155
    Free
  • 121
    Fast
  • 42
    High-Performance
  • 40
    High Availability
  • 35
    Data Structures
  • 32
    Very Scalable
  • 24
    Replication
  • 22
    Great community
  • 22
    Pub/Sub
  • 19
    "NoSQL" key-value data store
  • 16
    Hashes
  • 13
    Sets
  • 11
    Sorted Sets
  • 10
    NoSQL
  • 10
    Lists
  • 9
    Async replication
  • 9
    BSD licensed
  • 8
    Bitmaps
  • 8
    Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background
  • 7
    Keys with a limited time-to-live
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 6
    Lua scripting
  • 6
    Strings
  • 5
    Awesomeness for Free
  • 5
    Hyperloglogs
  • 4
    Transactions
  • 4
    Outstanding performance
  • 4
    Runs server side LUA
  • 4
    LRU eviction of keys
  • 4
    Feature Rich
  • 4
    Written in ANSI C
  • 4
    Networked
  • 3
    Data structure server
  • 3
    Performance & ease of use
  • 2
    Dont save data if no subscribers are found
  • 2
    Automatic failover
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Temporarily kept on disk
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    Existing Laravel Integration
  • 2
    Channels concept
  • 2
    Object [key/value] size each 500 MB
  • 2
    Simple

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of RavenDB
Cons of Redis
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 15
      Cannot query objects directly
    • 3
      No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
    • 1
      No WAL

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is RavenDB?

    As a document database it remains true to the core principles of these type of storage mechanisms. Somehow it managed to combine the best of relational databases with that of document databases.

    What is Redis?

    Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use RavenDB?
    What companies use Redis?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with RavenDB?
    What tools integrate with Redis?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Nov 20 2019 at 3:38AM

    OneSignal

    PostgreSQLRedisRuby+8
    9
    4691
    Jun 6 2019 at 5:11PM

    AppSignal

    RedisRubyKafka+9
    15
    1678
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    41
    36952
    What are some alternatives to RavenDB and Redis?
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    Elasticsearch
    Elasticsearch is a distributed, RESTful search and analytics engine capable of storing data and searching it in near real time. Elasticsearch, Kibana, Beats and Logstash are the Elastic Stack (sometimes called the ELK Stack).
    Couchbase
    Developed as an alternative to traditionally inflexible SQL databases, the Couchbase NoSQL database is built on an open source foundation and architected to help developers solve real-world problems and meet high scalability demands.
    LiteDB
    Embedded NoSQL database for .NET. An open source MongoDB-like database with zero configuration - mobile ready
    Cassandra
    Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.
    See all alternatives