Rails vs Rails Spring

Overview

Rails

Stacks20.2K

Followers13.8K

Votes5.5K

GitHub Stars57.8K

Forks22.0K

Rails Spring

Stacks593

Followers32

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.8K

Forks344

Rails vs Rails Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will discuss the key differences between Rails and Rails Spring.

Performance: Rails Spring is specifically designed to optimize the startup time and performance of Rails applications by preloading the Rails environment. This can significantly reduce the time it takes for the application to boot up and respond to requests compared to traditional Rails.
Memory Usage: Rails Spring aims to reduce memory usage by keeping a preloaded Rails application in memory, allowing for faster response times with lower resource consumption. This can be especially beneficial for applications with high traffic volumes or limited resources.
Ease of Use: Rails Spring simplifies the development process by automatically preloading the Rails environment in the background, making it easier for developers to work on their applications without having to manually start up the environment each time changes are made. This can improve productivity and streamline the development workflow.
Development Environment: Rails Spring is particularly useful in development environments where frequent code changes are made and the Rails server needs to be restarted multiple times. By keeping the Rails environment loaded, developers can see immediate changes without the need to restart the server, saving time and improving efficiency.
Dependencies: Rails Spring may introduce conflicts or unexpected behavior with certain gems or dependencies that are not compatible with the preloading mechanism. Developers need to be aware of potential issues that may arise when using Rails Spring and carefully manage gem dependencies to avoid conflicts.
Legacy Compatibility: While Rails Spring can bring performance improvements and efficiency gains to new Rails applications, it may not be as effective for legacy applications that were not built with Rails Spring in mind. Migrating an existing application to Rails Spring may require additional effort to ensure compatibility and optimal performance.

In Summary, Rails Spring offers improved performance and memory usage optimization but may require careful management of dependencies and compatibility considerations, especially for legacy applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Rails, Rails Spring

Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Java

Rails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

915k views915k

Comments

Ben

May 19, 2020

Decided

As a small team, we wanted to pick the framework which allowed us to move quickly. There's no option better than Rails. Not having to solve the fundamentals means we can more quickly build our feature set. No other framework can beat ActiveRecord in terms of integration & ease-of use. To top it all of, there's a lot of attention paid to security in the framework, making almost everything safe-by-default.

482k views482k

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails	Rails Spring
Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.	Spring is a Rails application preloader. It speeds up development by keeping your application running in the background so you don't need to boot it every time you run a test, rake task or migration.
-	Totally automatic; no need to explicitly start and stop the background process;Reloads your application code on each run;Restarts your application when configs / initializers / gem dependencies are changed;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 57.8K	GitHub Stars 2.8K
GitHub Forks 22.0K	GitHub Forks 344
Stacks 20.2K	Stacks 593
Followers 13.8K	Followers 32
Votes 5.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 860 Rapid development 653 Great gems 607 Great community 486 Convention over configuration 418 Mvc Cons 24 Too much "magic" (hidden behavior) 14 Poor raw performance 12 Asset system is too primitive and outdated 6 Bloat in models 6 Heavy use of mixins	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rails, Rails Spring?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Rails vs Rails Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will discuss the key differences between Rails and Rails Spring.

Performance: Rails Spring is specifically designed to optimize the startup time and performance of Rails applications by preloading the Rails environment. This can significantly reduce the time it takes for the application to boot up and respond to requests compared to traditional Rails.
Memory Usage: Rails Spring aims to reduce memory usage by keeping a preloaded Rails application in memory, allowing for faster response times with lower resource consumption. This can be especially beneficial for applications with high traffic volumes or limited resources.
Ease of Use: Rails Spring simplifies the development process by automatically preloading the Rails environment in the background, making it easier for developers to work on their applications without having to manually start up the environment each time changes are made. This can improve productivity and streamline the development workflow.
Development Environment: Rails Spring is particularly useful in development environments where frequent code changes are made and the Rails server needs to be restarted multiple times. By keeping the Rails environment loaded, developers can see immediate changes without the need to restart the server, saving time and improving efficiency.
Dependencies: Rails Spring may introduce conflicts or unexpected behavior with certain gems or dependencies that are not compatible with the preloading mechanism. Developers need to be aware of potential issues that may arise when using Rails Spring and carefully manage gem dependencies to avoid conflicts.
Legacy Compatibility: While Rails Spring can bring performance improvements and efficiency gains to new Rails applications, it may not be as effective for legacy applications that were not built with Rails Spring in mind. Migrating an existing application to Rails Spring may require additional effort to ensure compatibility and optimal performance.

Rails vs Rails Spring

Overview

Rails vs Rails Spring: What are the differences?