Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

QuestDB

17
48
+ 1
17
TimescaleDB

212
368
+ 1
44
Add tool

QuestDB vs TimescaleDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

QuestDB and TimescaleDB are two popular time-series databases that offer high-performance data storage and analytics capabilities. However, they have several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Data Model: QuestDB uses a columnar data model that stores data in columns, which allows for faster data retrieval and compression. On the other hand, TimescaleDB uses a hypertable data model, which is an abstraction layer on top of PostgreSQL tables. This allows TimescaleDB to leverage the familiar SQL capabilities of PostgreSQL while providing additional time-series specific optimizations.

  2. Concurrency Control: QuestDB utilizes a lock-free architecture that enables high levels of concurrency and scalability. It does not rely on traditional locking mechanisms, allowing multiple threads and transactions to access and modify data simultaneously. In contrast, TimescaleDB uses PostgreSQL's MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control) mechanism, which provides excellent isolation between transactions but may introduce some contention in high-throughput scenarios.

  3. Query Language: QuestDB supports a SQL-like query language that allows users to perform complex data operations and aggregations. It provides a familiar interface for users already experienced in SQL. TimescaleDB, being an extension of PostgreSQL, offers full compatibility with SQL and benefits from a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries built around PostgreSQL.

  4. Scalability: QuestDB is designed to be highly scalable and can achieve high ingest rates and low query latencies even with large amounts of data. It leverages distributed computing techniques to achieve scalability across multiple nodes. TimescaleDB is also scalable and can handle high-throughput workloads, but it relies on the scalability and distributed capabilities of PostgreSQL for horizontal scaling.

  5. Data Partitioning: QuestDB uses automatic sharding to partition data across multiple nodes, allowing for parallel processing and efficient data retrieval. It automatically distributes data based on the configured shard key. TimescaleDB offers hypertables, which provide automatic partitioning of data based on time or another user-defined column. This allows for efficient data organization and management.

  6. Data Compression: QuestDB utilizes aggressive compression techniques to reduce data storage requirements and optimize memory usage. It employs delta compression, bit packing, run-length encoding, and other compression algorithms to achieve high compression ratios. TimescaleDB also supports compression but relies on standard compression techniques available in PostgreSQL.

In summary, QuestDB and TimescaleDB differ in their data models, concurrency control mechanisms, query languages, scalability approaches, data partitioning techniques, and data compression strategies. Each database offers its own unique set of features and optimizations catering to specific use cases and requirements.

Advice on QuestDB and TimescaleDB
Needs advice
on
InfluxDBInfluxDBMongoDBMongoDB
and
TimescaleDBTimescaleDB

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

See more
Replies (3)
Yaron Lavi
Recommends
on
PostgreSQLPostgreSQL

We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale, and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us a We had a similar challenge. We started with DynamoDB, Timescale and even InfluxDB and Mongo - to eventually settle with PostgreSQL. Assuming the inbound data pipeline in queued (for example, Kinesis/Kafka -> S3 -> and some Lambda functions), PostgreSQL gave us better performance by far.

See more
Recommends
on
DruidDruid

Druid is amazing for this use case and is a cloud-native solution that can be deployed on any cloud infrastructure or on Kubernetes. - Easy to scale horizontally - Column Oriented Database - SQL to query data - Streaming and Batch Ingestion - Native search indexes It has feature to work as TimeSeriesDB, Datawarehouse, and has Time-optimized partitioning.

See more
Ankit Malik
Software Developer at CloudCover · | 3 upvotes · 317.5K views
Recommends
on
Google BigQueryGoogle BigQuery

if you want to find a serverless solution with capability of a lot of storage and SQL kind of capability then google bigquery is the best solution for that.

See more
Decisions about QuestDB and TimescaleDB
Benoit Larroque
Principal Engineer at Sqreen · | 2 upvotes · 132.2K views

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of QuestDB
Pros of TimescaleDB
  • 2
    No dependencies
  • 2
    Real-time analytics
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Postgres wire protocol
  • 2
    Time-series data analysis
  • 2
    SQL
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Embedded
  • 1
    InfluxDB line protocol
  • 1
    HTTP API
  • 1
    High-performance
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Easy Query Language
  • 7
    Time-series data analysis
  • 5
    Established postgresql API and support
  • 4
    Reliable
  • 2
    Paid support for automatic Retention Policy
  • 2
    Chunk-based compression
  • 2
    Postgres integration
  • 2
    High-performance
  • 2
    Fast and scalable
  • 1
    Case studies

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of QuestDB
Cons of TimescaleDB
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      Licensing issues when running on managed databases

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is QuestDB?

    QuestDB is an open source database for time series, events, and analytical workloads with a primary focus on performance. It enhances ANSI SQL with time series extensions.

    What is TimescaleDB?

    TimescaleDB: An open-source database built for analyzing time-series data with the power and convenience of SQL — on premise, at the edge, or in the cloud.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use QuestDB?
    What companies use TimescaleDB?
    See which teams inside your own company are using QuestDB or TimescaleDB.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with QuestDB?
    What tools integrate with TimescaleDB?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to QuestDB and TimescaleDB?
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    Microsoft SQL Server
    Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.
    SQLite
    SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.
    See all alternatives