StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Java Tools
  5. Quarkus vs Thymeleaf

Quarkus vs Thymeleaf

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Thymeleaf
Thymeleaf
Stacks212
Followers296
Votes4
Quarkus
Quarkus
Stacks311
Followers382
Votes80
GitHub Stars15.2K
Forks3.0K

Quarkus vs Thymeleaf: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Quarkus and Thymeleaf, two popular technologies used in web development.

  1. Development approach: Quarkus is a Java framework specifically designed for building cloud-native applications. It offers a reactive and serverless approach, allowing developers to write efficient and scalable code. On the other hand, Thymeleaf is a server-side Java template engine that focuses on generating dynamic web content. It enables the seamless integration of templates into web applications.

  2. Language support: Quarkus primarily supports Java language, allowing developers to leverage existing Java libraries and frameworks. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, provides support for multiple programming languages, including Java, JavaScript, and even other server-side scripting languages like Groovy and Kotlin.

  3. Architecture: Quarkus follows a microservices and container-first architecture, enabling lightweight and efficient applications. It leverages technologies like Eclipse MicroProfile and GraalVM for enhanced performance. On the other hand, Thymeleaf is architecture-agnostic and can be integrated into various types of web applications, ranging from monolithic to microservices-based architectures.

  4. Server-side rendering vs. client-side rendering: Quarkus primarily focuses on server-side rendering, where the rendering of web content is handled on the server before being sent to the client's browser. This approach is suitable for applications that need to perform complex server-side processing and rendering. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, supports both server-side and client-side rendering, allowing for a more flexible approach depending on the requirements of the application.

  5. Dependency management: Quarkus offers built-in dependency management and extension system, which allows developers to easily include and manage required libraries and extensions in their projects. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, relies on traditional dependency management systems like Maven or Gradle for managing project dependencies.

  6. Template-driven vs. code-driven development: Thymeleaf provides a template-driven development approach, where developers focus on creating HTML templates with embedded dynamic elements and expressions. Quarkus, on the other hand, emphasizes a code-driven development approach, where developers write code to define the behavior and logic of the application.

In summary, Quarkus and Thymeleaf differ in their development approach, language support, architecture, rendering approach, dependency management, and development style. While Quarkus is focused on building cloud-native applications using Java, Thymeleaf offers an agnostic template engine that supports multiple programming languages and can be integrated into various types of web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Thymeleaf
Thymeleaf
Quarkus
Quarkus

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

-
CONTAINER FIRST; UNIFIES IMPERATIVE AND REACTIVE; BEST OF BREED LIBRARIES AND STANDARDS
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
Stacks
212
Stacks
311
Followers
296
Followers
382
Votes
4
Votes
80
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Its delicous
Pros
  • 13
    Fast startup
  • 13
    Open source
  • 11
    Produce native code
  • 11
    Low memory footprint
  • 10
    Integrated with GraalVM
Cons
  • 2
    Boilerplate code when using Reflection
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Hibernate
Hibernate
Netty
Netty

What are some alternatives to Thymeleaf, Quarkus?

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

guava

guava

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

JavaMelody

JavaMelody

It is used to monitor Java or Java EE application servers in QA and production environments. It is not a tool to simulate requests from users, it is a tool to measure and calculate statistics on real operation of an application depending on the usage of the application by users. It is mainly based on statistics of requests and on evolution charts.

RxJava

RxJava

A library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs by using observable sequences for the Java VM.

MapStruct

MapStruct

It is a code generator that greatly simplifies the implementation of mappings between Java bean types based on a convention over configuration approach. The generated mapping code uses plain method invocations and thus is fast, type-safe and easy to understand.

Java 8

Java 8

It is a revolutionary release of the world’s no 1 development platform. It includes a huge upgrade to the Java programming model and a coordinated evolution of the JVM, Java language, and libraries. Java 8 includes features for productivity, ease of use, improved polyglot programming, security and improved performance.

Apache FreeMarker

Apache FreeMarker

It is a "template engine"; a generic tool to generate text output (anything from HTML to auto generated source code) based on templates. It's a Java package, a class library for Java programmers.

Jackson

Jackson

It is a suite of data-processing tools for Java (and the JVM platform), including the flagship streaming JSON parser / generator library, matching data-binding library (POJOs to and from JSON) and additional data format modules to process data encoded in Avro, BSON, CBOR, CSV, Smile, (Java) Properties, Protobuf, XML or YAML; and even the large set of data format modules to support data types of widely used data types such as Guava, Joda.

Project Reactor

Project Reactor

It is a fourth-generation Reactive library for building non-blocking applications on the JVM based on the Reactive Streams Specification. It is a fully non-blocking foundation with efficient demand management. It directly interacts with Java functional API, Completable Future, Stream and Duration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase