protobuf vs thrift

Overview

protobuf

Stacks508

Followers2

Votes0

thrift

Stacks41

Followers1

Votes0

protobuf vs thrift: What are the differences?

# Protocol Buffers vs. Apache Thrift

Introduction: Protocol Buffers (protobuf) and Apache Thrift are both popular frameworks for defining data structures and services. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that make each suitable for different use cases.

1. **Data Serialization**: Protobuf focuses on data serialization and binary encoding, while Thrift supports various data formats including JSON and XML in addition to binary serialization.
2. **Language Support**: Protobuf supports a wider range of programming languages including C++, Java, Python, and more, while Thrift has native support for fewer languages but allows for easier integration with languages not officially supported.
3. **Extensibility**: Protobuf provides better support for schema evolution, allowing for easier compatibility between different version of data structures, while Thrift has limited support for evolving schemas.
4. **Performance**: Protobuf is known for its efficient binary serialization which results in faster serialization and deserialization compared to Thrift, especially for large datasets.
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Thrift, being backed by Apache, has a larger community and ecosystem compared to protobuf, resulting in more resources, libraries, and support available for Thrift users.
6. **Tooling and Documentation**: Protobuf has more comprehensive tooling and documentation which makes it easier for developers to work with, while Thrift may have a steeper learning curve due to its lesser documentation and tooling.

In Summary, when choosing between Protocol Buffers and Apache Thrift, consider factors like data serialization needs, language support, schema evolution, performance, community support, and documentation availability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

protobuf	thrift
Protocol Buffers.	Python bindings for the Apache Thrift RPC system.
Statistics
Stacks 508	Stacks 41
Followers 2	Followers 1
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to protobuf, thrift?

google

Python bindings to the Google search engine.

requests

Python HTTP for Humans.

pytest

Pytest: simple powerful testing with Python.

boto3

The AWS SDK for Python.

pandas

Powerful data structures for data analysis, time series, and statistics.

numpy

NumPy is the fundamental package for array computing with Python.

six

Python 2 and 3 compatibility utilities.

urllib3

HTTP library with thread-safe connection pooling, file post, and more.

python-dateutil

Extensions to the standard Python datetime module.

flake8

The modular source code checker: pep8, pyflakes and co.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

protobuf vs thrift: What are the differences?

# Protocol Buffers vs. Apache Thrift

Introduction: Protocol Buffers (protobuf) and Apache Thrift are both popular frameworks for defining data structures and services. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them that make each suitable for different use cases.

1. **Data Serialization**: Protobuf focuses on data serialization and binary encoding, while Thrift supports various data formats including JSON and XML in addition to binary serialization.
2. **Language Support**: Protobuf supports a wider range of programming languages including C++, Java, Python, and more, while Thrift has native support for fewer languages but allows for easier integration with languages not officially supported.
3. **Extensibility**: Protobuf provides better support for schema evolution, allowing for easier compatibility between different version of data structures, while Thrift has limited support for evolving schemas.
4. **Performance**: Protobuf is known for its efficient binary serialization which results in faster serialization and deserialization compared to Thrift, especially for large datasets.
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Thrift, being backed by Apache, has a larger community and ecosystem compared to protobuf, resulting in more resources, libraries, and support available for Thrift users.
6. **Tooling and Documentation**: Protobuf has more comprehensive tooling and documentation which makes it easier for developers to work with, while Thrift may have a steeper learning curve due to its lesser documentation and tooling.

In Summary, when choosing between Protocol Buffers and Apache Thrift, consider factors like data serialization needs, language support, schema evolution, performance, community support, and documentation availability.