StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Protractor vs Selenium

Protractor vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
Protractor
Protractor
Stacks2.2K
Followers543
Votes33
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.3K

Protractor vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Protractor and Selenium are popular automation testing frameworks used for web application testing. While both tools serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between them that make each tool unique in its own way.

  1. Selenium is a generic automation framework, while Protractor is specifically designed for Angular applications: One of the main differences between Protractor and Selenium is their target applications. Selenium is a generic automation framework that can be used to test any web application, regardless of the technology stack. On the other hand, Protractor is primarily designed for testing Angular applications. It has built-in support for Angular-specific elements and features, making it easier to write and maintain tests for Angular applications.

  2. Protractor uses a different locator strategy for elements: Selenium primarily relies on CSS selectors and XPath to locate elements on a web page. Protractor, however, introduces a new locator strategy called "ng-model", which specifically targets elements in Angular applications. This locator strategy makes it easier to locate and interact with Angular-specific elements, such as input fields bound to Angular models.

  3. Protractor has built-in support for Angular synchronization: Angular applications often rely on asynchronous operations, such as AJAX requests and data binding. Protractor has built-in support for automatic waiting and synchronization with Angular, ensuring that tests are executed at the right time when the application is in a stable state. Selenium, on the other hand, requires explicit waits and synchronization to handle such scenarios.

  4. Protractor has better integration with Angular-specific testing utilities: Protractor provides seamless integration with Angular-specific testing utilities such as "ByAngular" and "ExpectedConditions". These utilities make it easier to write tests that interact with Angular-specific elements and features. Selenium, being a generic framework, does not have these Angular-specific utilities available out of the box.

  5. Protractor supports the Page Object pattern: Protractor promotes the use of the Page Object pattern, which helps in creating modular and maintainable test scripts. The Page Object pattern encapsulates the elements and functionalities of a web page into reusable classes, making test code more readable and maintainable. While Selenium also supports the Page Object pattern, Protractor has better inbuilt support for it.

  6. Selenium supports a wider range of browsers: Selenium supports a wider range of browsers compared to Protractor. Selenium WebDriver has official support for popular browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. Protractor, being an Angular-centric tool, has limited support for non-Angular applications and may not provide the same level of cross-browser compatibility as Selenium.

In summary, Protractor is specifically designed for testing Angular applications and offers built-in support for Angular-specific elements and features. It uses a different locator strategy, provides better integration with Angular-specific testing utilities, and promotes the use of the Page Object pattern. Selenium, on the other hand, is a generic automation framework that supports a wider range of browsers and can be used to test any web application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, Protractor

Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
Protractor
Protractor

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

-
Test Like a User; For Angular Apps; Automatic Waiting
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
2.2K
Followers
12.6K
Followers
543
Votes
527
Votes
33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Quick tests implementation
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    Promise support
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 4
    Limited
Integrations
No integrations available
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Protractor?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana