Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Prometheus vs Splunk: What are the differences?
Prometheus and Splunk are both popular tools used for monitoring and troubleshooting in the field of DevOps. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Data Collection and Storage: Prometheus is an open-source solution that uses a pull model for data collection. It gathers metrics by scraping designated endpoints at predefined intervals. The collected data is then stored in a time-series database. On the other hand, Splunk is a commercial solution that uses a push model. It receives data from various sources and indexes it in a centralized repository for easier search and analysis.
Network Overhead: Prometheus requires a relatively low network overhead as it only pulls data from the endpoints when needed. However, Splunk has a higher network overhead as it continuously receives data from multiple sources and requires more bandwidth for real-time monitoring.
Query Language and Analytics: Prometheus offers a flexible and powerful query language called PromQL, which allows users to perform complex queries and aggregations on the collected metrics. Splunk, on the other hand, uses its own search processing language (SPL), which provides a wide range of features for data search, correlation, and visualization.
Scalability: Prometheus is designed to be highly scalable, allowing it to handle large volumes of data and thousands of endpoints. It can easily be horizontally scaled by adding more instances. Splunk, on the other hand, may require additional infrastructure to scale effectively. It is more suitable for smaller or medium-scale deployments.
Alerting and Monitoring: Prometheus has built-in alerting capabilities, allowing users to define and configure alerts based on custom thresholds and conditions. It can send notifications through various channels such as email, Slack, or PagerDuty. Splunk also provides alerting capabilities, but it requires additional configuration and setup.
Cost: Prometheus is free and open-source, making it a cost-effective solution for many organizations. Splunk, being a commercial product, comes with associated licensing costs, which can be quite substantial depending on the deployment size and features used.
In summary, Prometheus is an open-source solution with powerful querying capabilities, lower network overhead, and cost-effectiveness. In contrast, Splunk is a commercial solution that offers advanced features, better scalability, and more options for data collection.
Looking for a tool which can be used for mainly dashboard purposes, but here are the main requirements:
- Must be able to get custom data from AS400,
- Able to display automation test results,
- System monitoring / Nginx API,
- Able to get data from 3rd parties DB.
Grafana is almost solving all the problems, except AS400 and no database to get automation test results.
You can look out for Prometheus Instrumentation (https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/instrumentation/) Client Library available in various languages https://prometheus.io/docs/instrumenting/clientlibs/ to create the custom metric you need for AS4000 and then Grafana can query the newly instrumented metric to show on the dashboard.
Hi, We have a situation, where we are using Prometheus to get system metrics from PCF (Pivotal Cloud Foundry) platform. We send that as time-series data to Cortex via a Prometheus server and built a dashboard using Grafana. There is another pipeline where we need to read metrics from a Linux server using Metricbeat, CPU, memory, and Disk. That will be sent to Elasticsearch and Grafana will pull and show the data in a dashboard.
Is it OK to use Metricbeat for Linux server or can we use Prometheus?
What is the difference in system metrics sent by Metricbeat and Prometheus node exporters?
Regards, Sunil.
If you're already using Prometheus for your system metrics, then it seems like standing up Elasticsearch just for Linux host monitoring is excessive. The node_exporter is probably sufficient if you'e looking for standard system metrics.
Another thing to consider is that Metricbeat / ELK use a push model for metrics delivery, whereas Prometheus pulls metrics from each node it is monitoring. Depending on how you manage your network security, opting for one solution over two may make things simpler.
Hi Sunil! Unfortunately, I don´t have much experience with Metricbeat so I can´t advise on the diffs with Prometheus...for Linux server, I encourage you to use Prometheus node exporter and for PCF, I would recommend using the instana tile (https://www.instana.com/supported-technologies/pivotal-cloud-foundry/). Let me know if you have further questions! Regards Jose
We're looking for a Monitoring and Logging tool. It has to support AWS (mostly 100% serverless, Lambdas, SNS, SQS, API GW, CloudFront, Autora, etc.), as well as Azure and GCP (for now mostly used as pure IaaS, with a lot of cognitive services, and mostly managed DB). Hopefully, something not as expensive as Datadog or New relic, as our SRE team could support the tool inhouse. At the moment, we primarily use CloudWatch for AWS and Pandora for most on-prem.
I worked with Datadog at least one year and my position is that commercial tools like Datadog are the best option to consolidate and analyze your metrics. Obviously, if you can't pay the tool, the best free options are the mix of Prometheus with their Alert Manager and Grafana to visualize (that are complementary not substitutable). But I think that no use a good tool it's finally more expensive that use a not really good implementation of free tools and you will pay also to maintain its.
this is quite affordable and provides what you seem to be looking for. you can see a whole thing about the APM space here https://www.apmexperts.com/observability/ranking-the-observability-offerings/
Pros of Prometheus
- Powerful easy to use monitoring47
- Flexible query language38
- Dimensional data model32
- Alerts27
- Active and responsive community23
- Extensive integrations22
- Easy to setup19
- Beautiful Model and Query language12
- Easy to extend7
- Nice6
- Written in Go3
- Good for experimentation2
- Easy for monitoring1
Pros of Splunk
- API for searching logs, running reports3
- Alert system based on custom query results3
- Splunk language supports string, date manip, math, etc2
- Dashboarding on any log contents2
- Custom log parsing as well as automatic parsing2
- Query engine supports joining, aggregation, stats, etc2
- Rich GUI for searching live logs2
- Ability to style search results into reports2
- Granular scheduling and time window support1
- Query any log as key-value pairs1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Prometheus
- Just for metrics12
- Bad UI6
- Needs monitoring to access metrics endpoints6
- Not easy to configure and use4
- Supports only active agents3
- Written in Go2
- TLS is quite difficult to understand2
- Requires multiple applications and tools2
- Single point of failure1
Cons of Splunk
- Splunk query language rich so lots to learn1