StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. PreFlight vs Selenium

PreFlight vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
PreFlight
PreFlight
Stacks2
Followers20
Votes0

PreFlight vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between PreFlight and Selenium in the context of website testing. Both PreFlight and Selenium are widely used tools for automating the testing process, but they have several distinct features and functionalities.

1. PreFlight: Test Automation Platform

PreFlight is a comprehensive test automation platform that allows developers and QA teams to automate and manage their test cases efficiently. It provides a user-friendly interface for writing test scripts, executing tests, and generating detailed reports. PreFlight supports multiple programming languages and offers a wide range of advanced test management features.

2. Selenium: Web Testing Framework

Selenium, on the other hand, is primarily a web testing framework that focuses on automating browser actions. It is extensively used for functional testing, regression testing, and cross-browser compatibility testing. Selenium supports different programming languages and provides a set of APIs for interacting with web elements, capturing screenshots, and validating test results.

3. User Interface:

PreFlight offers an intuitive graphical user interface (GUI) for creating and managing test cases. It allows users to easily design test scenarios, define test steps, and specify expected outcomes. Selenium, however, is more code-centric and relies on scripting to automate tests. Users need to write test scripts in supported programming languages to interact with web elements and perform actions.

4. Test Execution:

PreFlight executes tests on its own test execution engine, which provides advanced capabilities like parallel test execution, distributed testing, and real-time reporting. Selenium, on the other hand, requires a browser driver to interact with web browsers for test execution. It supports different drivers for popular web browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.

5. Test Management:

PreFlight provides comprehensive test management features, such as test case management, test suites, test data management, and test result analysis. It allows users to organize test cases in folders, define test data sets, and track test execution progress. Selenium, being a more focused web testing framework, does not have built-in test management capabilities. Users need to rely on external tools or frameworks for test case management and reporting.

6. Cross-platform Testing:

PreFlight supports cross-platform testing by allowing users to execute tests on different operating systems and browsers. It provides built-in support for virtual machines and cloud-based testing platforms. Selenium also supports cross-browser testing but requires users to install browser drivers specific to each browser and operating system.

In Summary, PreFlight is a comprehensive test automation platform with a user-friendly interface, advanced test management features, and cross-platform testing capabilities. Selenium, on the other hand, is a web testing framework focused on automating browser actions using code-centric scripting.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, PreFlight

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
PreFlight
PreFlight

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Record tests while using your product and process the test then you can run them on all the popular browsers, across Windows & MacOS.

-
Zero coding knowledge required; Schedule tests; Test across browsers; Everyone can test automatically
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
2
Followers
12.6K
Followers
20
Votes
527
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Travis CI
Travis CI
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitLab
GitLab
CircleCI
CircleCI
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Selenium, PreFlight?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana