Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Preact

443
290
+ 1
28
React.js Boilerplate

402
464
+ 1
18
Add tool

Preact vs React.js Boilerplate: What are the differences?

  1. Size: One major difference between Preact and React.js Boilerplate is the size. Preact is a lightweight alternative to React, weighing in at around 3kb when gzipped. In contrast, React.js Boilerplate includes a set of tools and configurations for setting up a development environment, resulting in a larger file size.

  2. Configuration: Preact is a JavaScript library that serves as a drop-in replacement for React, offering a similar API and functionality. On the other hand, React.js Boilerplate is a scaffold for building React-based web applications, providing a pre-configured development environment with additional tools like Redux, Webpack, and Babel.

  3. Performance: Preact is known for its faster performance compared to React, as it has a smaller footprint and optimized codebase. This can lead to quicker rendering and better overall performance in applications built with Preact. React.js Boilerplate, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive setup for large-scale applications, which may impact performance to some extent.

  4. Community Support: React.js Boilerplate enjoys strong community support, with a dedicated group of developers contributing to its ongoing development and maintenance. Preact also has a supportive community but may not be as extensive as the one surrounding React.js Boilerplate.

  5. Usage: Preact is commonly used in projects where size and performance are critical factors, such as single-page applications or projects with limited resources. React.js Boilerplate is suitable for larger, more complex applications that require a robust development environment and tools for scalability.

  6. Learning Curve: Preact, being a lightweight alternative to React, has a lower learning curve for developers familiar with React. In contrast, React.js Boilerplate may have a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive setup and additional tools provided out of the box.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Preact and React.js Boilerplate in terms of size, configuration, performance, community support, usage, and learning curve can help developers choose the appropriate library/framework for their web development projects.

Decisions about Preact and React.js Boilerplate
Damiano Magrini
Chose
PreactPreact
over
ReactReact

Preact offers an API which is extremely similar to React's for less than 10% of its size (and createElement is renamed to h, which makes the overall bundle a lot smaller). Although it is less compatible with other libraries than the latter (and its ecosystem is nowhere as developed), this is generally not a problem as Preact exposes the preact/compat API, which can be used as an alias both for React and ReactDOM and allows for the use of libraries which would otherwise just be compatible with React.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Preact
Pros of React.js Boilerplate
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Drop-in replacement for React
  • 4
    Performance
  • 3
    Props/state passed to render
  • 1
    ES6 class components
  • 4
    Amazing developer experience
  • 4
    Nice tooling
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    Easy offline first applications
  • 3
    Great documentation
  • 1
    Fast

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Preact?

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

What is React.js Boilerplate?

Quick setup for new performance orientated, offline–first React.js applications featuring Redux, hot–reloading, PostCSS, react-router, ServiceWorker, AppCache, FontFaceObserver and Mocha.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Preact?
What companies use React.js Boilerplate?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Preact?
What tools integrate with React.js Boilerplate?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

JavaScriptGitHubReact+12
5
4319
What are some alternatives to Preact and React.js Boilerplate?
React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
Inferno
Inferno is an isomorphic library for building high-performance user interfaces, which is crucial when targeting mobile devices. Unlike typical virtual DOM libraries like React, Mithril, Virtual-dom, Snabbdom and Om, Inferno uses techniques to separate static and dynamic content. This allows Inferno to only "diff" renders that have dynamic values.
Glimmer
Glimmer is one of the fastest DOM rendering engines, delivering exceptional performance for initial renders as well as updates.
Mithril
Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.
act
Rather than having to commit/push every time you want test out the changes you are making to your .github/workflows/ files (or for any changes to embedded GitHub actions), you can use this tool to run the actions locally. The environment variables and filesystem are all configured to match what GitHub provides.
See all alternatives