StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Test Management
  5. PractiTest vs QMetry

PractiTest vs QMetry

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PractiTest
PractiTest
Stacks11
Followers19
Votes0
QMetry
QMetry
Stacks15
Followers34
Votes0

PractiTest vs QMetry: What are the differences?

Introduction

Comparing PractiTest and QMetry to understand their key differences.

  1. Integration Compatibility: PractiTest offers seamless integration with various third-party tools like Jira, Jenkins, Slack, etc., making it easier for teams to work collaboratively. On the other hand, QMetry may have limitations in terms of integration with certain tools, which can affect workflow efficiency.

  2. Test Case Management Features: PractiTest provides advanced features for test case management such as customizable fields, test iterations, version control, and test sets, offering a comprehensive platform for managing test cases. Conversely, QMetry may lack some of these advanced features, which can impact the overall efficiency of test case management.

  3. Reporting Capabilities: PractiTest offers robust reporting capabilities with customizable graphs, metrics, and dashboards, allowing users to track and analyze testing progress effectively. In contrast, QMetry may have limited reporting options, which can hinder detailed analysis of test results and project status.

  4. Agile Testing Support: PractiTest is well-equipped to support agile testing methodologies with features like user stories, epics, sprints, and integration with agile project management tools. QMetry may not provide the same level of support for agile testing practices, potentially affecting the agility and efficiency of testing processes.

  5. Automation Integration: PractiTest offers seamless integration with popular test automation tools like Selenium, UFT, and TestComplete, enabling teams to combine manual and automated testing efforts seamlessly. In comparison, QMetry may have limitations in terms of automation tool compatibility, which can restrict the extent of automation integration.

  6. Customization Options: PractiTest provides extensive customization options for fields, workflows, reports, and dashboards, allowing users to tailor the tool according to their specific requirements and preferences. On the contrary, QMetry may offer limited customization capabilities, potentially limiting the tool's adaptability to diverse testing scenarios.

In Summary, PractiTest excels in integration compatibility, test case management features, reporting capabilities, agile testing support, automation integration, and customization options compared to QMetry.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PractiTest
PractiTest
QMetry
QMetry

It is an easy-to-use Test Management solution for professionals, allowing users to have all testing information in one central location.

It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles

Test Management; End-to-End QA Management; Manual Tests; Seamless Integration with CI Processes; Reporting & Dashboards; Including Dashboards into Wikis and Web Portals; Exporting Information to Statistical and Reporting Engines; Capturing & Organizing Requirements; Issue & Bug Tracking; Recording and Emailing Bugs and Issues; Smart Filters; Easy Customization; Access Rights for Each Project; Time Management
TEST PLAN MANAGEMENT; TEST CASE ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT; TEST EXECUTION MANAGEMENT; TEST DATA MANAGEMENT; DEFECT MANAGEMENT; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; RELEASE & BUILD MANAGEMENT.
Statistics
Stacks
11
Stacks
15
Followers
19
Followers
34
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Cons
  • 1
    Some terms and processes are confusing
  • 1
    Slow and clunky
Integrations
Selenium
Selenium
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Jira
Jira
Redmine
Redmine
GitLab
GitLab
FogBugz
FogBugz
Jenkins
Jenkins
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
TestFlight
TestFlight
UserTesting
UserTesting
Jira
Jira
TestNG
TestNG

What are some alternatives to PractiTest, QMetry?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana