StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. PMD vs SonarLint

PMD vs SonarLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PMD
PMD
Stacks46
Followers111
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.2K
Forks1.5K
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

PMD vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

PMD and SonarLint are both static code analysis tools used in the field of software development. They help developers identify and fix potential issues with their code, leading to improved code quality and fewer bugs. While they serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between the two tools that are worth noting.

  1. Analysis Coverage: PMD primarily focuses on analyzing the source code of a project, whereas SonarLint not only analyzes the source code but also captures code issues in other areas such as XML and properties files. This wider analysis coverage in SonarLint allows for a more comprehensive code review.

  2. Integration: PMD is typically integrated into the build process of a project as a standalone tool, externally executed after the code compilation. On the other hand, SonarLint provides plugins for popular Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like Eclipse and Visual Studio, enabling developers to receive real-time feedback during development without the need for separate tools or build process integration.

  3. Language Support: PMD supports a wide range of programming languages including Java, JavaScript, and XML, among others. SonarLint, on the other hand, has broader language support covering not only Java but also C#, Python, JavaScript, and many more. This makes SonarLint a more versatile option for multi-language projects.

  4. Rule Configuration: PMD offers a set of pre-defined rules that developers can enable or disable according to their requirements. SonarLint, on the other hand, not only provides pre-configured rules but also allows developers to define custom rules tailored to their specific project needs. This flexibility gives developers more control over the code analysis process.

  5. Feedback Mechanism: PMD provides feedback through console output or generated reports, which require developers to manually analyze the results. SonarLint, with its IDE integration, provides instant feedback within the IDE itself. It highlights code issues directly in the code editor, making it easier and more convenient for developers to identify and address the problems.

  6. Continuous Monitoring: SonarLint has the capability to connect with a SonarQube server, which allows for centralized code quality management. This means that code analysis results can be stored and monitored over time, providing historical data and trends on code quality. PMD, being a standalone tool, does not have built-in support for such continuous monitoring.

In summary, PMD and SonarLint are both valuable tools for code analysis, but they differ in terms of analysis coverage, integration options, language support, rule configuration flexibility, feedback mechanism, and continuous monitoring capabilities. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PMD
PMD
SonarLint
SonarLint

It is a source code analyzer. It finds common programming flaws like unused variables, empty catch blocks, unnecessary object creation, and so forth. It includes CPD, the copy-paste-detector.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

supports multiple languages; enforce a coding standard for your codebase; built-in checks
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
46
Stacks
175
Followers
111
Followers
352
Votes
0
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Windows
Windows
Java
Java
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to PMD, SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana