Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Playwright vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Playwright and Sauce Labs, two popular tools used in web development and testing.
Execution Environment: Playwright allows code execution in multiple browsers and platforms, including Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge, as well as Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides a cloud-based execution environment, enabling automated tests to run on real browsers and operating systems without the need for setting up and maintaining physical or virtual machines.
Cross-Browser Testing: Playwright offers extensive cross-browser support, allowing developers to write tests once and run them across different browsers effortlessly. It provides consistent APIs and handles browser-specific differences, making it easier to create robust and reliable tests. In contrast, Sauce Labs specializes in cross-browser testing by providing access to a wide range of browser and platform combinations, ensuring comprehensive testing across different environments.
Synchronization: Playwright is designed with built-in automatic waiting, eliminating the need for explicit synchronization code in most cases. It intelligently waits for page elements and actions, making tests more stable and reliable. Sauce Labs, on the other hand, requires explicit synchronization code to handle asynchronous actions and ensure test stability, giving developers more control over the timing of their tests.
Debugging Capabilities: Playwright offers advanced debugging capabilities, including the ability to take screenshots and record videos during test execution. It also provides detailed logs and debug information, facilitating easy troubleshooting of issues. Sauce Labs also offers similar debugging features such as screenshots and videos, but it additionally provides live debugging sessions, allowing developers to interactively debug their tests in real-time.
Test Parallelization: Playwright allows tests to run in parallel across multiple environments, enabling faster test execution and reducing the overall test cycle time. It provides a convenient way to scale test runs by distributing the load on multiple machines or instances. Meanwhile, Sauce Labs excels in test parallelization by providing a highly scalable cloud infrastructure that allows running tests in parallel across a large number of browsers and operating systems, drastically reducing testing time.
Pricing Model: Playwright is an open-source project maintained by Microsoft, making it freely available for usage. It provides a cost-effective solution for test automation, particularly for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, Sauce Labs follows a subscription-based pricing model that offers different tiers with varying levels of features and support. While it provides a powerful testing platform, the pricing may be more suitable for larger organizations with specific testing requirements.
In summary, Playwright offers cross-browser testing, synchronization, debugging capabilities, and test parallelization, with an open-source and cost-effective approach. Meanwhile, Sauce Labs specializes in cross-browser testing, provides a cloud-based execution environment, advanced debugging, extensive test parallelization, and offers a subscription-based pricing model.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.
These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.
AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.
Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.
BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.
Pros of Playwright
- Cross browser14
- Open source10
- Test Runner with Playwright/test9
- Promise based7
- Well documented7
- Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures5
- Execute tests in parallel5
- API Testing5
- Python Support4
- Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail4
- Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json3
- Context isolation3
- Fastest1
Pros of Sauce Labs
- Selenium-compatible60
- Webdriver compatible46
- Video recordings of every test35
- Qa31
- Mobile support29
- Any programming language26
- Developer tools23
- Test local and firewalled servers21
- Jenkins integration20
- Pristine VMs18
- CI Compatible17
- Appium support11
- Parallel testing9
- Rapid environment preparation8
- Mobile device support8
- Easy testing on almost any device7
- Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT7
- Secure testing and easy setup6
- Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests5
- Quick support response5
- Fast and reliable to host the automated tests4
- Easy to setup and understand,4
- Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci3
- Maintained browser matrix3
- Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers3
- Efficient tool to verify product quality2
- Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win2
- Hany for platform testing2
- Great documentation2
- Generous free trial2
- Easy. Straightforward. Scalable2
- Great way to integrate test suite on cloud2
- Simplicity of Sauce-connect2
- Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support1
- It's great for my QA work1
- Awesome tech support1
- Having this available for CI servers is fantastic1
- Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing1
- Depth of integrations1
- Because of its cloud based support for appium1
- Easy setup, Works great with selenium.1
- QE support1
- Manuals are not very well versed for beginners1
- Secure testing1
- Cheaper than browserstack1
- Stable1
- Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Playwright
- Less help12
- Node based3
- Does not execute outside of browser2
Cons of Sauce Labs
- Relatively slow2
- Expensive2