Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Playwright

462
550
+ 1
77
Sauce Labs

314
435
+ 1
438
Add tool

Playwright vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Playwright and Sauce Labs, two popular tools used in web development and testing.

  1. Execution Environment: Playwright allows code execution in multiple browsers and platforms, including Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Edge, as well as Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Sauce Labs provides a cloud-based execution environment, enabling automated tests to run on real browsers and operating systems without the need for setting up and maintaining physical or virtual machines.

  2. Cross-Browser Testing: Playwright offers extensive cross-browser support, allowing developers to write tests once and run them across different browsers effortlessly. It provides consistent APIs and handles browser-specific differences, making it easier to create robust and reliable tests. In contrast, Sauce Labs specializes in cross-browser testing by providing access to a wide range of browser and platform combinations, ensuring comprehensive testing across different environments.

  3. Synchronization: Playwright is designed with built-in automatic waiting, eliminating the need for explicit synchronization code in most cases. It intelligently waits for page elements and actions, making tests more stable and reliable. Sauce Labs, on the other hand, requires explicit synchronization code to handle asynchronous actions and ensure test stability, giving developers more control over the timing of their tests.

  4. Debugging Capabilities: Playwright offers advanced debugging capabilities, including the ability to take screenshots and record videos during test execution. It also provides detailed logs and debug information, facilitating easy troubleshooting of issues. Sauce Labs also offers similar debugging features such as screenshots and videos, but it additionally provides live debugging sessions, allowing developers to interactively debug their tests in real-time.

  5. Test Parallelization: Playwright allows tests to run in parallel across multiple environments, enabling faster test execution and reducing the overall test cycle time. It provides a convenient way to scale test runs by distributing the load on multiple machines or instances. Meanwhile, Sauce Labs excels in test parallelization by providing a highly scalable cloud infrastructure that allows running tests in parallel across a large number of browsers and operating systems, drastically reducing testing time.

  6. Pricing Model: Playwright is an open-source project maintained by Microsoft, making it freely available for usage. It provides a cost-effective solution for test automation, particularly for small to medium-sized projects. On the other hand, Sauce Labs follows a subscription-based pricing model that offers different tiers with varying levels of features and support. While it provides a powerful testing platform, the pricing may be more suitable for larger organizations with specific testing requirements.

In summary, Playwright offers cross-browser testing, synchronization, debugging capabilities, and test parallelization, with an open-source and cost-effective approach. Meanwhile, Sauce Labs specializes in cross-browser testing, provides a cloud-based execution environment, advanced debugging, extensive test parallelization, and offers a subscription-based pricing model.

Advice on Playwright and Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

See more
Replies (3)
Aaron Evans
Testing Strategist at One Shore · | 3 upvotes · 12.3K views

A SaaS offering like Sauce Labs (or BrowserStack or LambdaTest, etc) will provide a remote Selenium/Appium Grid including the ability to run test automation in parallel (up to the amount based your subscription level) an a wide array of browsers and mobile devices.

These tools can be expensive, but if you can afford them, the expertise and effort of maintaining the grid, browser updates, etc. is worth it.

AWS Device Farm can be significantly cheaper, but is much more work to setup and run. It will not give you as many devices, or the reporting and screen/video capture you get with the the services. And there is no support for AWS Device Farm, and very poor documentation. I have used it, but do not recommend it. Running your own grid and physical device lab is better, but I'd stick with a service like Sauce Labs or Perfecto which will save you time and give you better services despite the higher price tag.

See more
Recommends
on
BrowserStackBrowserStack

Stability - Just works. Availability - More than 15 datacenters. Enterprise features like SSO, local testing and SOC2/GDPR compliant.

See more
Jaymie Falconi
Recommends
on
BitBarBitBar

BitBar's Dedicated Devices would be a great option for you. It allows you to dedicate (reserve) devices for your use only which also having access to all of the devices in the shared cloud. BitBar has the features and integrations that you are looking for as well.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Playwright
Pros of Sauce Labs
  • 14
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
  • 26
    Any programming language
  • 23
    Developer tools
  • 21
    Test local and firewalled servers
  • 20
    Jenkins integration
  • 18
    Pristine VMs
  • 17
    CI Compatible
  • 11
    Appium support
  • 9
    Parallel testing
  • 8
    Rapid environment preparation
  • 8
    Mobile device support
  • 7
    Easy testing on almost any device
  • 7
    Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
  • 6
    Secure testing and easy setup
  • 5
    Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
  • 5
    Quick support response
  • 4
    Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
  • 4
    Easy to setup and understand,
  • 3
    Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
  • 3
    Maintained browser matrix
  • 3
    Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
  • 2
    Efficient tool to verify product quality
  • 2
    Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
  • 2
    Hany for platform testing
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Generous free trial
  • 2
    Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
  • 2
    Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
  • 2
    Simplicity of Sauce-connect
  • 1
    Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
  • 1
    It's great for my QA work
  • 1
    Awesome tech support
  • 1
    Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
  • 1
    Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
  • 1
    Depth of integrations
  • 1
    Because of its cloud based support for appium
  • 1
    Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
  • 1
    QE support
  • 1
    Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
  • 1
    Secure testing
  • 1
    Cheaper than browserstack
  • 1
    Stable
  • 0
    Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Playwright
Cons of Sauce Labs
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
  • 2
    Relatively slow
  • 2
    Expensive

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Playwright?

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

What is Sauce Labs?

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Playwright?
What companies use Sauce Labs?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Playwright?
What tools integrate with Sauce Labs?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Playwright and Sauce Labs?
Puppeteer
Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Protractor
Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
TestCafe
It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
See all alternatives