Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Pixi

95
85
+ 1
8
three.js

771
512
+ 1
0
Add tool

Pixi vs three.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Pixi and three.js are both JavaScript libraries used for creating interactive and visually appealing graphics on the web. While they share similarities in terms of functionality, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Rendering Approach: Pixi focuses on rendering 2D graphics and is optimized for high-performance rendering of large numbers of sprites, making it ideal for creating 2D games and applications. On the other hand, three.js is primarily designed for rendering 3D graphics and offers a wide range of features and tools specifically tailored for working with 3D objects.

  2. API Design: Pixi provides a simple and intuitive API that is easy to learn and use, making it a good choice for beginners. It has a straightforward display object model that allows for easy manipulation and animation of sprites. In contrast, three.js has a more complex API due to its extensive feature set for working with 3D objects and scenes. It requires a deeper understanding of 3D concepts and may have a steeper learning curve for newcomers.

  3. Performance: Pixi is renowned for its excellent performance and high frame rates even on low-end devices. It achieves this by utilizing WebGL, an efficient rendering technology that leverages the power of the GPU. Three.js also uses WebGL for rendering 3D graphics but may not be as optimized for high-performance 2D rendering as Pixi.

  4. Community and Documentation: Both Pixi and three.js have active communities and are well-documented. However, three.js has been around for a longer time and consequently has a larger community and more extensive documentation. It also has a vast number of examples, tutorials, and resources available, making it easier to find solutions to common problems.

  5. Dependencies: Pixi is a standalone library and does not have any external dependencies. This means that it can be used standalone with minimal setup. On the other hand, three.js has several external dependencies such as WebGL, which needs to be supported by the device's browser. It also requires a basic understanding of linear algebra concepts for working with 3D transformations.

  6. Suitability for Projects: Pixi is well-suited for 2D projects, especially games and applications that require high-performance rendering of large numbers of sprites. Its simplicity and performance make it an excellent choice for creating 2D graphics-rich experiences. Three.js, on the other hand, is better suited for projects that involve 3D graphics, such as architectural visualization, product showcases, or virtual reality experiences.

In summary, Pixi is optimized for high-performance 2D rendering, has a simple API, and is suitable for 2D games and applications, while three.js is focused on 3D rendering, has a more extensive feature set and learning curve, and is ideal for creating 3D graphics on the web.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Pixi
Pros of three.js
  • 8
    Fast Performance
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Pixi?

    Super fast HTML 5 2D rendering engine that uses webGL with canvas fallback

    What is three.js?

    It is a cross-browser JavaScript library and Application Programming Interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Pixi and three.js as a desired skillset
    Postman
    San Francisco, United States
    What companies use Pixi?
    What companies use three.js?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Pixi or three.js.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Pixi?
    What tools integrate with three.js?
    What are some alternatives to Pixi and three.js?
    Kibana
    Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.
    Grafana
    Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.
    Prometheus
    Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.
    Nagios
    Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.
    Zabbix
    Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.
    See all alternatives