Phaser vs react-three-fiber

Overview

Phaser

Stacks134

Followers173

Votes4

react-three-fiber

Stacks52

Followers46

Votes0

Phaser vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Rendering Pipeline: In Phaser, the rendering pipeline is primarily 2D-focused, allowing for the creation of 2D games with ease. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is more geared towards 3D rendering, leveraging the power of WebGL and Three.js library for creating immersive 3D experiences.
Component-Based Structure: Phaser follows a traditional game development approach, where game objects are directly manipulated and updated within the game loop. In contrast, react-three-fiber utilizes a component-based structure similar to React, allowing developers to create reusable and composable 3D components.
Performance Optimization: Phaser emphasizes performance optimization for 2D games, with features like sprite batching and physics system tailored for 2D environments. While react-three-fiber also considers performance, it focuses more on leveraging React's virtual DOM for efficiently updating and rendering complex 3D scenes.
Community and Ecosystem: Phaser has a strong community and a robust ecosystem with a wide range of plugins, tools, and resources tailored for 2D game development. On the other hand, react-three-fiber benefits from the extensive React community and ecosystem, providing access to a wealth of React libraries and tools for building immersive 3D applications.
Documentation and Learning Curve: Phaser offers comprehensive documentation and tutorials aimed at helping developers quickly get started with 2D game development. In comparison, react-three-fiber relies on the documentation of Three.js and React, which may require developers to have a solid understanding of these technologies, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
Use Cases: Phaser is well-suited for developing 2D games, including platformers, puzzle games, and mobile games, due to its focus on 2D rendering and game development features. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is ideal for creating 3D visualizations, virtual reality experiences, and interactive 3D websites that require the power and flexibility of WebGL and Three.js.

In Summary, Phaser and react-three-fiber cater to different needs in the game and web development space, with Phaser excelling in 2D game development while react-three-fiber shines in creating immersive 3D experiences using React and Three.js.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phaser	react-three-fiber
It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools.	It is a React renderer for Threejs on the web and react-native. Rendering performance is up to Threejs and the GPU. Components participate in the renderloop outside of React, without any additional overhead.
-	React renderer for Three.js; Web and react-native
Statistics
Stacks 134	Stacks 52
Followers 173	Followers 46
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Open Source 1 WebGL and Canvas rendering 1 JavaScript or TypeScript 1 Compile to iOS, Android and native apps Cons 4 No GUI	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	React three.js

What are some alternatives to Phaser, react-three-fiber?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Panda3D

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Related Comparisons

Phaser vs react-three-fiber: What are the differences?

Rendering Pipeline: In Phaser, the rendering pipeline is primarily 2D-focused, allowing for the creation of 2D games with ease. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is more geared towards 3D rendering, leveraging the power of WebGL and Three.js library for creating immersive 3D experiences.
Component-Based Structure: Phaser follows a traditional game development approach, where game objects are directly manipulated and updated within the game loop. In contrast, react-three-fiber utilizes a component-based structure similar to React, allowing developers to create reusable and composable 3D components.
Performance Optimization: Phaser emphasizes performance optimization for 2D games, with features like sprite batching and physics system tailored for 2D environments. While react-three-fiber also considers performance, it focuses more on leveraging React's virtual DOM for efficiently updating and rendering complex 3D scenes.
Community and Ecosystem: Phaser has a strong community and a robust ecosystem with a wide range of plugins, tools, and resources tailored for 2D game development. On the other hand, react-three-fiber benefits from the extensive React community and ecosystem, providing access to a wealth of React libraries and tools for building immersive 3D applications.
Documentation and Learning Curve: Phaser offers comprehensive documentation and tutorials aimed at helping developers quickly get started with 2D game development. In comparison, react-three-fiber relies on the documentation of Three.js and React, which may require developers to have a solid understanding of these technologies, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve.
Use Cases: Phaser is well-suited for developing 2D games, including platformers, puzzle games, and mobile games, due to its focus on 2D rendering and game development features. On the other hand, react-three-fiber is ideal for creating 3D visualizations, virtual reality experiences, and interactive 3D websites that require the power and flexibility of WebGL and Three.js.

Phaser vs react-three-fiber

Overview