Phalcon vs Slim

Overview

Phalcon

Stacks246

Followers294

Votes354

GitHub Stars10.8K

Forks2.0K

Slim

Stacks273

Followers391

Votes152

GitHub Stars12.2K

Forks2.0K

Phalcon vs Slim: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Here are the key differences between Phalcon and Slim:

1. **Architecture**: Phalcon is a full-stack PHP framework that is written in C and operates as a C extension, providing high performance and lower resource utilization. On the other hand, Slim is a micro-framework that is mainly focused on creating APIs and small web applications with minimal overhead.
   
2. **Learning Curve**: Phalcon is more complex and may have a steeper learning curve due to its unique architecture and C extension. Slim, being a micro-framework, is simpler and easier to learn for developers who are new to PHP frameworks.
   
3. **Features**: Phalcon offers a wider range of features out of the box, including ORM, caching, and security features, making it suitable for complex and large-scale applications. Slim, on the other hand, provides essential features like routing and middleware but requires additional components or middleware for more advanced functionality.
   
4. **Performance**: As Phalcon is written in C and operates as a C extension, it generally offers better performance in terms of speed and resource utilization compared to Slim, which is written in PHP only.
   
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Phalcon has a smaller but dedicated community and ecosystem, with fewer resources and libraries available compared to Slim, which has a larger and more active community with a wide range of plugins and extensions.
   
6. **Flexibility**: Slim is known for its flexibility and lightweight nature, allowing developers to have more control over the components they use in their applications. Phalcon, on the other hand, provides a more opinionated structure and may limit flexibility in certain aspects.

In Summary, Phalcon and Slim differ in terms of architecture, learning curve, features, performance, community, and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phalcon	Slim
Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.	Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.8K	GitHub Stars 12.2K
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks 2.0K
Stacks 246	Stacks 273
Followers 294	Followers 391
Votes 354	Votes 152
Pros & Cons
Pros 65 Fast 54 High performance 37 Open source 35 Fast and easy to use 32 Scalable Cons 4 Support few databases 2 Very bad documentation	Pros 33 Microframework 27 API 22 Open source 21 Php 11 Fast
Integrations
PHP	PHP

What are some alternatives to Phalcon, Slim?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Phalcon vs Slim: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Here are the key differences between Phalcon and Slim:

1. **Architecture**: Phalcon is a full-stack PHP framework that is written in C and operates as a C extension, providing high performance and lower resource utilization. On the other hand, Slim is a micro-framework that is mainly focused on creating APIs and small web applications with minimal overhead.
   
2. **Learning Curve**: Phalcon is more complex and may have a steeper learning curve due to its unique architecture and C extension. Slim, being a micro-framework, is simpler and easier to learn for developers who are new to PHP frameworks.
   
3. **Features**: Phalcon offers a wider range of features out of the box, including ORM, caching, and security features, making it suitable for complex and large-scale applications. Slim, on the other hand, provides essential features like routing and middleware but requires additional components or middleware for more advanced functionality.
   
4. **Performance**: As Phalcon is written in C and operates as a C extension, it generally offers better performance in terms of speed and resource utilization compared to Slim, which is written in PHP only.
   
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Phalcon has a smaller but dedicated community and ecosystem, with fewer resources and libraries available compared to Slim, which has a larger and more active community with a wide range of plugins and extensions.
   
6. **Flexibility**: Slim is known for its flexibility and lightweight nature, allowing developers to have more control over the components they use in their applications. Phalcon, on the other hand, provides a more opinionated structure and may limit flexibility in certain aspects.

In Summary, Phalcon and Slim differ in terms of architecture, learning curve, features, performance, community, and flexibility.

Phalcon vs Slim

Overview