StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. Pelican vs Vault

Pelican vs Vault

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pelican
Pelican
Stacks88
Followers113
Votes28
GitHub Stars13.1K
Forks1.8K
Vault
Vault
Stacks816
Followers802
Votes71
GitHub Stars33.4K
Forks4.5K

Pelican vs Vault: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Pelican and Vault are two popular tools in the realm of content management and security, each designed for specific purposes. Understanding the key differences between the two can help users make informed decisions when choosing the right tool for their needs.

1. **Customization and Flexibility**: Pelican offers a high degree of customization and flexibility for content management, allowing users to tailor their website to fit their specific requirements. On the other hand, Vault focuses on security and secret management, providing a secure repository for sensitive information such as API keys and passwords, with less emphasis on customization.

2. **Content Management vs. Security Focus**: Pelican is primarily a content management system that helps users create and manage website content efficiently, offering features like easy-to-use templates and themes. In contrast, Vault is a tool for secure storage and access control of sensitive data, prioritizing security over content management functionalities.

3. **Open-Source vs. Enterprise-level Solution**: Pelican is an open-source software that is freely available for users to download, customize, and use according to their needs. Meanwhile, Vault is developed by HashiCorp and is considered an enterprise-level solution, offering advanced security features and support services for organizations with more complex security requirements.

4. **Community Support and Documentation**: Pelican benefits from a large and active user community, which translates to extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available for users to enhance their websites. While Vault also has a supportive community, its focus on security means that documentation and resources may be more specialized and geared towards security professionals.

5. **Ease of Use and Learning Curve**: Pelican is known for its user-friendly interface and relatively low learning curve, making it ideal for beginners and users with limited technical expertise. Vault, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of security concepts and practices, leading to a steeper learning curve for users who are not familiar with security principles.

6. **Scalability and Integration**: Pelican is well-suited for small to medium-sized websites, offering scalability options through plugins and extensions. In contrast, Vault is designed to scale with enterprise-level security needs, integrating seamlessly with other HashiCorp tools like Terraform and Consul for comprehensive security solutions.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Pelican and Vault, such as customization, focus, open-source, community support, ease of use, and scalability, can help users choose the right tool based on their specific content management or security needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pelican
Pelican
Vault
Vault

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

Vault is a tool for securely accessing secrets. A secret is anything that you want to tightly control access to, such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and more. Vault provides a unified interface to any secret, while providing tight access control and recording a detailed audit log.

Blog articles and pages;Comments, via an external service (Disqus). (Please note that while useful, Disqus is an external service, and thus the comment data will be somewhat outside of your control and potentially subject to data loss.);Theming support (themes are created using Jinja2 templates);PDF generation of the articles/pages (optional);Publication of articles in multiple languages;Atom/RSS feeds;Code syntax highlighting;Import from WordPress, Dotclear, or RSS feeds;Integration with external tools: Twitter, Google Analytics, etc. (optional);Fast rebuild times thanks to content caching and selective output writing.
Secure Secret Storage: Arbitrary key/value secrets can be stored in Vault. Vault encrypts these secrets prior to writing them to persistent storage, so gaining access to the raw storage isn't enough to access your secrets. Vault can write to disk, Consul, and more.;Dynamic Secrets: Vault can generate secrets on-demand for some systems, such as AWS or SQL databases. For example, when an application needs to access an S3 bucket, it asks Vault for credentials, and Vault will generate an AWS keypair with valid permissions on demand. After creating these dynamic secrets, Vault will also automatically revoke them after the lease is up.;Data Encryption: Vault can encrypt and decrypt data without storing it. This allows security teams to define encryption parameters and developers to store encrypted data in a location such as SQL without having to design their own encryption methods.;Leasing and Renewal: All secrets in Vault have a lease associated with it. At the end of the lease, Vault will automatically revoke that secret. Clients are able to renew leases via built-in renew APIs.;Revocation: Vault has built-in support for secret revocation. Vault can revoke not only single secrets, but a tree of secrets, for example all secrets read by a specific user, or all secrets of a particular type. Revocation assists in key rolling as well as locking down systems in the case of an intrusion.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.1K
GitHub Stars
33.4K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
4.5K
Stacks
88
Stacks
816
Followers
113
Followers
802
Votes
28
Votes
71
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Jinja2
  • 4
    Easy to deploy
  • 4
    Implemented in Python
  • 3
    Plugability
Pros
  • 17
    Secure
  • 13
    Variety of Secret Backends
  • 11
    Very easy to set up and use
  • 8
    Dynamic secret generation
  • 5
    AuditLog
Integrations
Markdown
Markdown
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Pelican, Vault?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp