StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Headless Browsers
  5. PhantomJS vs pdfmake

PhantomJS vs pdfmake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PhantomJS
PhantomJS
Stacks1.7K
Followers430
Votes18
GitHub Stars29.5K
Forks5.7K
pdfmake
pdfmake
Stacks63
Followers5
Votes0

PhantomJS vs pdfmake: What are the differences?

  1. Execution Environment: PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with a JavaScript API, while pdfmake is a client-side PDF printing library for AngularJS. PhantomJS allows for webpage automation and can render pages to PDF, whereas pdfmake is specifically designed for creating PDF documents within an AngularJS application.

  2. Features: PhantomJS is more versatile and can perform tasks like webpage manipulation and testing, while pdfmake focuses solely on PDF generation and customization within AngularJS. PhantomJS allows for advanced web scraping and automation capabilities, whereas pdfmake excels in creating visually appealing PDFs with ease.

  3. Dependencies: PhantomJS requires a scriptable environment for execution and often relies on external tools like CasperJS for advanced testing scenarios, while pdfmake is standalone and self-contained within AngularJS for PDF generation. PhantomJS needs additional tools and libraries to fully utilize its capabilities, whereas pdfmake is straightforward and integrated into the AngularJS framework.

  4. Community Support: PhantomJS has a larger and more active community due to its broader use cases in web development, testing, and automation, while pdfmake is specialized for PDF creation within AngularJS projects. PhantomJS has a wider range of resources and plugins available for developers, whereas pdfmake's community is more focused on PDF-related topics and features.

  5. Performance: PhantomJS may have performance overhead due to its comprehensive capabilities and dependencies, while pdfmake is optimized for generating PDFs efficiently within an AngularJS application. PhantomJS's versatility may come at the cost of slower processing times in certain scenarios, whereas pdfmake is streamlined for quick PDF generation without unnecessary overhead.

  6. Updates and Maintenance: PhantomJS has experienced slower updates and maintenance in recent years, potentially leading to compatibility issues with newer web technologies, while pdfmake is actively maintained and updated to align with AngularJS updates and advancements. PhantomJS users may face challenges with compatibility and security as the technology landscape evolves, whereas pdfmake offers more consistent updates and support for AngularJS developers.

In Summary, when comparing PhantomJS and pdfmake, the key differences lie in their execution environments, features, dependencies, community support, performance, and updates/maintenance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PhantomJS
PhantomJS
pdfmake
pdfmake

PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.

pdfmake, client/server side PDF printing in pure JavaScript.

Multiplatform, available on major operating systems: Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and other Unices; Fast and native implementation of web standards: DOM, CSS, JavaScript, Canvas, and SVG. No emulation; Pure headless (no X11) on Linux, ideal for continuous integration systems. Also runs on Amazon EC2, Heroku, and Iron.io; Easy to install: Download, unpack, and start having fun in just 5 minutes
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
63
Followers
430
Followers
5
Votes
18
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Scriptable web browser
  • 3
    Depends on QT
  • 2
    No ECMAScript 6
No community feedback yet
Integrations
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PhantomJS, pdfmake?

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

HeadlessTesting

HeadlessTesting

Headless Browser Cloud for Developers. Connect your Puppeteer and Playwright scripts to our Cloud. Automated Browser Testing with Puppeteer and Playwright in the Cloud.

jsdom

jsdom

It is a pure-JavaScript implementation of many web standards, notably the WHATWG DOM and HTML Standards, for use with Node.js. In general, the goal of the project is to emulate enough of a subset of a web browser to be useful for testing and scraping real-world web applications.

PDF.js

PDF.js

It is a Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer that is built with HTML5. It is community-driven and supported by Mozilla Labs. The goal is to create a general-purpose, web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs.

CasperJS

CasperJS

CasperJS is a browser navigation scripting & testing utility written in Javascript for PhantomJS or SlimerJS.

Adobe Acrobat

Adobe Acrobat

Create, edit, and review PDFs. E-sign documents and collect signatures. Collaborate with your team. All in one app.

WeasyPrint

WeasyPrint

It is a visual rendering engine for HTML and CSS that can export to PDF. It aims to support web standards for printing. It is free software made available under a BSD license.

Splash

Splash

It is a headless browser that executes JavaScript for people crawling websites. It is open source and fully integrated with Scrapy and Portia. You can also use its API to integrate with any project that needs to render JavaScript pages.

SlimerJS

SlimerJS

It allows you to manipulate a web page with an external Javascript script: opening a webpage, clicking on links, modifying the content... It is useful to do functional tests, page automation, network monitoring, screen capture etc.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot