Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
PagerDuty vs sendQuick onCloud: What are the differences?
Developers describe PagerDuty as "Incident management with powerful visibility, reliable alerting, and improved collaboration". PagerDuty is an alarm aggregation and dispatching service for system administrators and support teams. It collects alerts from your monitoring tools, gives you an overall view of all of your monitoring alarms, and alerts an on duty engineer if there's a problem. On the other hand, sendQuick onCloud is detailed as "SaaS-based Incident Notification Management". It is a systems availability monitoring and notification management platform for the cloud. It works with public cloud services to monitor systems, applications, services and network and flags up issues to your staff on duty.
PagerDuty and sendQuick onCloud can be categorized as "Monitoring Aggregation" tools.
Some of the features offered by PagerDuty are:
- Alerting that works (and wakes you up)- When your systems go down, PagerDuty will wake you up. You choose how you want to be alerted - via phone, SMS or email, to multiple numbers, with retries.
- Integrate all your existing monitoring tools- PagerDuty works great with almost all monitoring tools including: Nagios (and Icinga), Keynote, New Relic, Pingdom, Circonus, Red Gate SQL Monitor, Server Density, Zenoss, Monit, Munin, SolarWinds and many others. If it can send email, it will work with PagerDuty.
- Native apps with push notifications- iOS and Android native apps with push notifications and a cross-platform mobile website ensure you can respond to alerts wherever you are, even on the go.
On the other hand, sendQuick onCloud provides the following key features:
- Email Message Filter
- IP-addressable Devices’ Ping, Port Checks
- URL Checks
I'm currently on PagerDuty, but I'm about to add enough users to go out of the starter tier, which will dramatically increase my license cost. PagerDuty is, in my experience, quite clunky, and I'm looking for alternatives. Squadcast is one I've found, and another is xMatters. Between the three, I'm currently leaning towards xMatters, but I'd like to know what people suggest.
Disclosure I work at Splunk and VictorOps is a Splunk product. But I would suggest in addition to trying the others adding VO to your list. It's important to note that some of the tools are designed as Incident Response tools, others started as mass notification tools. For on-call stick to those designed for incident response.
I would say to use Squadcast, the configuration is easy, provides a lot of features such as war room, RCA tracking postmortem, RBAC and they are quick to add features on request as well, recently I asked for custom on call reminders and I am sure they will add it really soon.
Pros of PagerDuty
- Just works55
- Easy configuration23
- Awesome alerting hub14
- Fantastic Alert aggregation and on call management11
- User-customizable alerting modes9
- Awesome tool for alerting and monitoring. Love it4
- Most reliable out of the three and it isn't even close3
Pros of sendQuick onCloud
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of PagerDuty
- Expensive7
- Ugly UI3
Cons of sendQuick onCloud
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is PagerDuty?
What is sendQuick onCloud?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use sendQuick onCloud?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with sendQuick onCloud?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+32
+12
+10
+22
+31+22+34+15