Padrino vs Sinatra

Overview

Sinatra

Stacks1.1K

Followers502

Votes212

GitHub Stars12.4K

Forks2.1K

Padrino

Stacks28

Followers34

Votes9

GitHub Stars3.4K

Forks502

Padrino vs Sinatra: What are the differences?

Routing: Padrino provides advanced routing capabilities compared to Sinatra. Padrino supports nested routing, named routes, and route conditions, offering more flexibility and organization in defining routes.
Generators: Padrino comes with built-in generators for quickly scaffolding applications, models, controllers, and more. This makes the development process more efficient and helps in following best practices in project structure.
ORM Integration: Padrino seamlessly integrates with multiple ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) libraries such as ActiveRecord, DataMapper, and Mongoid, providing developers with the freedom to choose the most suitable ORM for their project.
Templates: Padrino has built-in support for multiple template languages like ERB, Haml, and Slim, making it easier for developers to work with their preferred template engines without additional configuration.
Modular Architecture: Padrino encourages a modular architecture by allowing developers to create multiple applications within a single Padrino project. This helps in keeping the codebase organized and promotes code reusability.
Plugin System: Padrino offers a plugin system that allows developers to extend the functionality of their applications easily. This modular approach enables developers to add new features without cluttering the main application codebase.

In Summary, Padrino and Sinatra differ in their routing capabilities, generators, ORM integration, template support, modular architecture, and plugin system, with Padrino providing more advanced features and flexibility for web application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sinatra	Padrino
Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.	Padrino is a ruby framework built upon the excellent Sinatra Microframework. Padrino was created to make it fun and easy to code more advanced web applications while still adhering to the spirit that makes Sinatra great!
Statistics
GitHub Stars 12.4K	GitHub Stars 3.4K
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks 502
Stacks 1.1K	Stacks 28
Followers 502	Followers 34
Votes 212	Votes 9
Pros & Cons
Pros 65 Lightweight 50 Simple 35 Open source 20 Ruby 13 Great ecosystem of tools	Pros 4 Microframework 2 Open source 2 Built on top of Sinatra 1 Beautiful code
Integrations
Ruby	Ruby

What are some alternatives to Sinatra, Padrino?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Padrino vs Sinatra: What are the differences?

Routing: Padrino provides advanced routing capabilities compared to Sinatra. Padrino supports nested routing, named routes, and route conditions, offering more flexibility and organization in defining routes.
Generators: Padrino comes with built-in generators for quickly scaffolding applications, models, controllers, and more. This makes the development process more efficient and helps in following best practices in project structure.
ORM Integration: Padrino seamlessly integrates with multiple ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) libraries such as ActiveRecord, DataMapper, and Mongoid, providing developers with the freedom to choose the most suitable ORM for their project.
Templates: Padrino has built-in support for multiple template languages like ERB, Haml, and Slim, making it easier for developers to work with their preferred template engines without additional configuration.
Modular Architecture: Padrino encourages a modular architecture by allowing developers to create multiple applications within a single Padrino project. This helps in keeping the codebase organized and promotes code reusability.
Plugin System: Padrino offers a plugin system that allows developers to extend the functionality of their applications easily. This modular approach enables developers to add new features without cluttering the main application codebase.

Padrino vs Sinatra

Overview