StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Image Optimization
  4. Image Processing And Management
  5. OpenCL vs OpenCV

OpenCL vs OpenCV

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenCV
OpenCV
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.1K
Votes102
OpenCL
OpenCL
Stacks51
Followers70
Votes0

OpenCL vs OpenCV: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Syntax and Purpose: OpenCL is a language and framework that allows developers to write programs that run on heterogeneous platforms, including CPUs, GPUs, and other accelerators. It is primarily focused on parallel computing and data-parallel task execution. On the other hand, OpenCV is a library that provides a wide range of computer vision algorithms and functions. It is primarily used for image and video processing, machine learning, and computer vision applications.

  2. Key difference 2: Execution Model: OpenCL follows a task-based execution model, where tasks are scheduled and executed in parallel on multiple devices. It provides explicit control over memory allocation and movement among devices. On the other hand, OpenCV is designed to be used in a sequential manner, where algorithms are executed one after another. It abstracts the underlying hardware and memory management, providing a high-level interface for developers.

  3. Key difference 3: Language and API: OpenCL uses its own programming language based on C99, which allows developers to write low-level, optimized code for parallel processing. It provides an API for managing devices, executing tasks, and transferring data. On the other hand, OpenCV is primarily implemented in C++ and provides a C++ API for developers. It encapsulates complex algorithms and functions into easy-to-use interfaces, making it suitable for rapid prototyping and development.

  4. Key difference 4: Scope of Functionality: OpenCL is a general-purpose computing framework and can be used for a wide range of applications beyond computer vision, such as scientific simulations, financial modeling, and data analytics. It provides low-level access to hardware resources and is highly customizable. On the other hand, OpenCV is specifically designed for computer vision tasks and provides a comprehensive set of algorithms and functions tailored for image and video processing.

  5. Key difference 5: Portability and Compatibility: OpenCL is an open standard that is supported by a wide range of hardware vendors, including CPUs, GPUs, and FPGAs. It provides a platform-agnostic programming model, allowing developers to write code that can run on different devices. On the other hand, OpenCV is a library that can be used with various programming languages and platforms, including Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, and iOS. It provides a consistent interface across different platforms, making it easy to port applications.

  6. Key difference 6: Performance Optimization: OpenCL provides low-level control over memory and task execution, allowing developers to optimize their code for performance. It supports features such as explicit memory movement, shared local memory, and fine-grained parallelism. On the other hand, OpenCV is optimized for ease of use and provides high-level interfaces that abstract the underlying hardware. It focuses on providing efficient implementations of commonly used computer vision algorithms, rather than fine-grained performance optimization.

In Summary, OpenCL is a language and framework for parallel computing on heterogeneous platforms, while OpenCV is a library for computer vision applications. OpenCL follows a task-based execution model with low-level control over memory and hardware, while OpenCV provides high-level interfaces and optimized implementations of computer vision algorithms. OpenCL is portable and widely supported by hardware vendors, while OpenCV is compatible with various platforms and programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenCV
OpenCV
OpenCL
OpenCL

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

It is the open, royalty-free standard for cross-platform, parallel programming of diverse processors found in personal computers, servers, mobile devices and embedded platforms. It greatly improves the speed and responsiveness of a wide spectrum of applications in numerous market categories including gaming and entertainment titles, scientific and medical software, professional creative tools, vision processing, and neural network training and inferencing.

C++, C, Python and Java interfaces and supports Windows, Linux, Mac OS, iOS and Android;More than 47 thousand people of user community and estimated number of downloads exceeding 7 million;Usage ranges from interactive art, to mines inspection, stitching maps on the web or through advanced robotics
Cross-platform;Parallel programming ;Improves the speed and responsiveness
Statistics
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
51
Followers
1.1K
Followers
70
Votes
102
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Computer Vision
  • 18
    Open Source
  • 12
    Imaging
  • 10
    Face Detection
  • 10
    Machine Learning
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
C++
C++
Python
Python
Java
Java
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to OpenCV, OpenCL?

Cloudinary

Cloudinary

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

imgix

imgix

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

ImageKit

ImageKit

ImageKit offers a real-time URL-based API for image & video optimization, streaming, and 50+ transformations to deliver perfect visual experiences on websites and apps. It also comes integrated with a Digital Asset Management solution.

Cloudimage

Cloudimage

Effortless image resizing, optimization and CDN delivery. Make your site fully responsive and really fast.

scikit-image

scikit-image

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

Kraken.io

Kraken.io

It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API.

ImageEngine

ImageEngine

ImageEngine is an intelligent Image CDN that dynamically optimizes image content tailored to the end users device. Using device intelligence at the CDN edge, developers can greatly simplify their image management process while accelerating their site.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

GStreamer

GStreamer

It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing.

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick is the swiss army knife of image processing. Comprised of 267K physical lines (according to David A. Wheeler's SLOCCount) of source code in the base package (or 1,225K including 3rd party libraries) it provides a robust and efficient collection of tools and libraries which support reading, writing, and manipulating an image in over 88 major formats including important formats like DPX, GIF, JPEG, JPEG-2000, PNG, PDF, PNM, and TIFF.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase