1. Data Model: Open Lowcode utilizes a visual data model approach, allowing users to define entities, attributes, and relationships visually in a user-friendly manner. On the other hand, Remake focuses more on generating code based on provided templates and configurations, rather than offering a visual data modeling feature.
2. Code Generation: Open Lowcode focuses on generating reusable code based on the defined data model, reducing the need for manual coding and improving development efficiency. In contrast, Remake predominantly focuses on boilerplate code generation based on templates to expedite development, with less emphasis on reusable code components.
3. Community Support: Open Lowcode boasts a growing open-source community, allowing for collaboration, contributions, and continuous improvement. In comparison, Remake has a smaller contributor base and a more closed development model.
4. Platform Flexibility: Open Lowcode supports a wider range of platforms and languages, making it suitable for a broader spectrum of development projects. Remake, on the other hand, is more restricted in terms of supported platforms and languages.
5. Ease of Learning: Open Lowcode prioritizes user-friendly interfaces and comprehensive documentation, making it more accessible to developers of varying skill levels. In contrast, Remake may have a steeper learning curve due to its reliance on specific templates and configurations for code generation.
6. Customization Options: Open Lowcode offers a high degree of customization for generated code and application functionalities, catering to diverse project requirements. Meanwhile, Remake may have limitations in customization options due to its reliance on predefined templates and configurations.

In Summary, Open Lowcode distinguishes itself from Remake through its visual data modeling, emphasis on reusable code generation, community support, platform flexibility, ease of learning, and customization options.