StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Nuget Packages
  5. iTextSharp vs itext7

iTextSharp vs itext7

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

iTextSharp
iTextSharp
Stacks76
Followers2
Votes0
itext7
itext7
Stacks24
Followers3
Votes0

iTextSharp vs itext7: What are the differences?

Introduction

iTextSharp and iText7 are both libraries used for creating and manipulating PDF documents in .NET. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two versions.

  1. Differences in Architecture: iTextSharp is based on a monolithic architecture where different functionalities are combined into a single assembly. On the other hand, iText7 follows a modular architecture where functionalities are divided into separate modules, providing better flexibility and scalability.

  2. API Redesign: iText7 introduced a completely redesigned API in order to provide a more intuitive and streamlined development experience. The API of iTextSharp is different from iText7, requiring developers to familiarize themselves with the new API when migrating from iTextSharp to iText7.

  3. Improved Performance: iText7 offers improved performance compared to iTextSharp. It utilizes a more efficient rendering engine, resulting in faster document generation and manipulation.

  4. Enhanced PDF Standards Compliance: iText7 has better compliance with the PDF standards, such as PDF/A, PDF/UA, and PDF 2.0. It provides advanced features for creating and validating PDF documents that conform to the latest standards.

  5. Modular Licensing: iText7 introduced a more flexible and modular licensing model. Developers can choose the specific modules they need, allowing for more cost-effective licensing based on their requirements. iTextSharp, on the other hand, has a more traditional licensing model.

  6. Support and Documentation: iText7 benefits from more comprehensive support and documentation compared to iTextSharp. It has a dedicated support team and a wide range of resources, including tutorials, examples, and API documentation, making it easier for developers to get started and resolve any issues they encounter.

In summary, iText7 offers a redesigned API, improved performance, better compliance with PDF standards, modular licensing options, and comprehensive support and documentation, making it a recommended choice for developers over iTextSharp.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

iTextSharp
iTextSharp
itext7
itext7

PLEASE NOTE: iTextSharp is EOL, and has been replaced by iText 7. Only security fixes will be added We HIGHLY recommend customers use iText 7 for new projects, and to consider moving existing projects from iTextSharp to iText 7 to benefit from the many improvements such as: * HTML to PDF (PDF/UA) conversion * PDF Redaction * SVG support * Better language support (Indic, Thai, Khmer, Arabic, Hebrew) * PDF Debugging for your IDE * Data Extraction * Better continued support and bugfixes * More modular, extensible handling of your document workflow * Extra practical add-ons * Encryption, hashing and digital signatures iText is a PDF library that allows you to CREATE, ADAPT, INSPECT and MAINTAIN documents in the Portable Document Format (PDF), allowing you to add PDF functionality to your software projects with ease. We even have documentation to help you get coding. iText 7 is available under AGPL and Commercial license. iText 7 community: https://www.nuget.org/packages/itext7/ iText 7 is a complete re-write of iText 5, allowing you to choose your adventure with add-ons, all based on a simple, modular code structure that is easy to use and well documented. iText 7 includes pdfDebug, the first debugging tool that gives you a clear overview of your content streams and document structure as well as pdfCalligraph, allowing you to leverage advanced typography. Several iText engineers are actively supporting the project on StackOverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/itext.

IText 7 represents the next level of SDKs for developers that want to take advantage of the benefits PDF can bring. Equipped with a better document engine, high- and low-level programming capabilities and the ability to create, edit and enhance PDF documents, iText 7 can be a boon to nearly every workflow. iText 7 allows you to build custom PDF scenarios for web, mobile, desktop or cloud apps in Java and .NET.

Statistics
Stacks
76
Stacks
24
Followers
2
Followers
3
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to iTextSharp, itext7?

Amazon.CDK.AWS.KMS

Amazon.CDK.AWS.KMS

CDK Constructs for AWS KMS (Stability: Stable).

Newtonsoft.Json

Newtonsoft.Json

Json.NET is a popular high-performance JSON framework for .NET.

jQuery

jQuery

JQuery is a new kind of JavaScript Library. jQuery is a fast and concise JavaScript Library that simplifies HTML document traversing, event handling, animating, and Ajax interactions for rapid web development. jQuery is designed to change the way that you write JavaScript. NOTE: This package is maintained on behalf of the library owners by the NuGet Community Packages project at http://nugetpackages.codeplex.com/.

xunit

xunit

XUnit.net is a developer testing framework, built to support Test Driven Development, with a design goal of extreme simplicity and alignment with framework features. Installing this package installs xunit.core, xunit.assert, and xunit.analyzers.

xunit.runner.visualstudio

xunit.runner.visualstudio

Visual Studio 2012+ Test Explorer runner for the xUnit.net framework. Capable of running xUnit.net v1.9.2 and v2.0+ tests. Supports .NET 2.0 or later, .NET Core 1.0 or later, and Universal Windows 10.0 or later.

Moq

Moq

Moq is the most popular and friendly mocking framework for .NET.

Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client

Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client

This package adds support for formatting and content negotiation to System.Net.Http. It includes support for JSON, XML, and form URL encoded data.

Serilog

Serilog

Simple .NET logging with fully-structured events.

Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json

Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json

JSON configuration provider implementation for Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.

Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure

Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure

This package contains the Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure assembly that lets you dynamically register HTTP modules at run time.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase