Node.js vs QuickJS

Overview

Node.js

Stacks200.4K

Followers164.5K

Votes8.5K

GitHub Stars114.1K

Forks33.7K

QuickJS

Stacks4

Followers12

Votes0

Node.js vs QuickJS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Node.js and QuickJS are both popular JavaScript runtime environments that allow users to execute JavaScript code outside of a web browser. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

Execution Environment: Node.js is primarily designed for server-side applications and provides a powerful runtime environment for building scalable network applications. On the other hand, QuickJS is more focused on lightweight and embedded applications, making it suitable for resource-constrained devices like microcontrollers.
Package Management: Node.js has its own package manager called npm (Node Package Manager), which is a vast ecosystem of open-source libraries and tools. It enables developers to easily install, manage, and share reusable code modules. QuickJS, being a lightweight runtime environment, does not have an official package manager, although there are alternative package managers available for it.
Performance: Node.js is built on the V8 JavaScript engine, which compiles JavaScript code into machine code for efficient execution. It is known for its high performance and scalability, making it suitable for handling concurrent requests in server applications. QuickJS, on the other hand, focuses on providing a minimal footprint and aims to be extremely fast and efficient, making it ideal for resource-limited environments.
Platform Support: Node.js has excellent platform support and can run on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides consistent APIs for interacting with the underlying system resources, making it easy to develop cross-platform applications. QuickJS also supports multiple platforms, including Linux, macOS, Windows, and even some less common platforms like Android and WebAssembly.
Language Support: Node.js primarily supports JavaScript for application development. However, it also allows the use of other languages like TypeScript and CoffeeScript, which can be compiled into JavaScript code. QuickJS, on the other hand, focuses solely on JavaScript and does not provide built-in support for other languages. It aims to provide a minimalistic JavaScript runtime environment.
Size and Memory Footprint: Node.js, being more feature-rich and oriented towards server applications, has a larger memory footprint and binary size. It requires more resources to run, making it less suitable for resource-constrained devices. QuickJS, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and has a smaller memory footprint and binary size, making it more suitable for embedded systems and devices with limited resources.

In Summary, Node.js is a powerful and scalable JavaScript runtime environment primarily focused on server-side applications, while QuickJS is a lightweight and fast runtime environment designed for resource-constrained devices and embedded systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Node.js, QuickJS

abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL

Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
Peer to peer Selling of used items
Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Node.js	QuickJS
Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.	It supports the ES2019 specification including modules, asynchronous generators and proxies. It optionally supports mathematical extensions such as big integers (BigInt), big floating point numbers (BigFloat) and operator overloading.
-	Small and easily embeddable; no external dependency; Fast interpreter
Statistics
GitHub Stars 114.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 33.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 200.4K	Stacks 4
Followers 164.5K	Followers 12
Votes 8.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1439 Npm 1279 Javascript 1129 Great libraries 1012 High-performance 805 Open source Cons 46 Bound to a single CPU 45 New framework every day 40 Lots of terrible examples on the internet 33 Asynchronous programming is the worst 24 Callback	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Linux JavaScript macOS

What are some alternatives to Node.js, QuickJS?

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Node.js vs QuickJS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Execution Environment: Node.js is primarily designed for server-side applications and provides a powerful runtime environment for building scalable network applications. On the other hand, QuickJS is more focused on lightweight and embedded applications, making it suitable for resource-constrained devices like microcontrollers.
Package Management: Node.js has its own package manager called npm (Node Package Manager), which is a vast ecosystem of open-source libraries and tools. It enables developers to easily install, manage, and share reusable code modules. QuickJS, being a lightweight runtime environment, does not have an official package manager, although there are alternative package managers available for it.
Performance: Node.js is built on the V8 JavaScript engine, which compiles JavaScript code into machine code for efficient execution. It is known for its high performance and scalability, making it suitable for handling concurrent requests in server applications. QuickJS, on the other hand, focuses on providing a minimal footprint and aims to be extremely fast and efficient, making it ideal for resource-limited environments.
Platform Support: Node.js has excellent platform support and can run on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides consistent APIs for interacting with the underlying system resources, making it easy to develop cross-platform applications. QuickJS also supports multiple platforms, including Linux, macOS, Windows, and even some less common platforms like Android and WebAssembly.
Language Support: Node.js primarily supports JavaScript for application development. However, it also allows the use of other languages like TypeScript and CoffeeScript, which can be compiled into JavaScript code. QuickJS, on the other hand, focuses solely on JavaScript and does not provide built-in support for other languages. It aims to provide a minimalistic JavaScript runtime environment.
Size and Memory Footprint: Node.js, being more feature-rich and oriented towards server applications, has a larger memory footprint and binary size. It requires more resources to run, making it less suitable for resource-constrained devices. QuickJS, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and has a smaller memory footprint and binary size, making it more suitable for embedded systems and devices with limited resources.

Node.js vs QuickJS

Overview

Node.js vs QuickJS: What are the differences?