Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Nightwatchjs vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?
Introduction
Nightwatchjs and WebdriverIO are both popular automation testing frameworks used for web application testing. While they have similarities in terms of functionality, there are several key differences between the two that set them apart.
Synchronization: In Nightwatchjs, synchronization with the browser is handled automatically, allowing commands to be executed immediately after an action. On the other hand, WebdriverIO requires explicit synchronization, ensuring that commands are only executed once the previous command has completed.
Command Syntax: Nightwatchjs follows a simple command syntax that makes it easy to read and write test cases. It uses a keyword-driven approach, where the actions to be performed are specified using keywords. WebdriverIO, however, uses a more traditional syntax, where actions are written using JavaScript functions.
Multiremote Testing: WebdriverIO supports multiremote testing, which allows running tests on multiple browsers simultaneously. This feature is not available in Nightwatchjs, making it more suitable for cross-browser testing scenarios.
Customization: Nightwatchjs provides a wide range of out-of-the-box commands and assertions, which makes it easy to get started with testing. WebdriverIO, on the other hand, allows more customization options and provides a plugin-based architecture that enables users to extend and modify its functionality according to their specific requirements.
Community Support: WebdriverIO has a larger and more active community compared to Nightwatchjs. This means that there is a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support available for WebdriverIO users, making it easier to resolve issues or find solutions to specific challenges.
Integration with Other Tools: Nightwatchjs has built-in integration with popular tools like Jenkins and Sauce Labs, making it easier to incorporate testing into the CI/CD pipeline. WebdriverIO also provides integrations with tools like Selenium Grid and supports parallel testing, making it more suitable for larger test suites.
In summary, Nightwatchjs is a simpler and more straightforward automation testing framework, while WebdriverIO offers more flexibility and advanced features for customization and collaboration.
we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................
with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing
Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!
You should also definitely look into Playwright, which is a new automation tool from Microsoft building on top of the Puppeteer experience and trying to bring this experience in the cross browser space - very exciting project. Great team. Also CodeceptJS as already Playwright support which at a ton of valuable features on top of Playwright, give it a go!
I'm also looking for the same, FE: React & BE: NodeJS. Cypress won't help as it lacks cross-browser testing, it doesn't support all the browsers. I'm still investigating it, but looks like WebdriverIO may fulfil what I'm looking for - Cross-browser testing, integration with CI/CD, running it as a docker service, good support on assertions & reporting of test results. Let me know if you found any information on any of the above mentioned points.
Hi Esther, if you really need cross OS and cross device automation Cypress wont help, with WebdriverIO you can do it … and check out CodeceptJS, which is a wrapper around several frameworks (like WebdriverIO) and will support future players (currently for example upcoming Playwright) as well.
Pros of Nightwatchjs
- Open source3
- Testing2
- Automates browsers2
- Better cross browser (use selenium)1
- Cross-Browser Testing1
- Multiple Browser Support1
- Parallel Test Running1
Pros of WebdriverIO
- Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs11
- Open Source10
- Great community8
- Easy to setup7
- Best solution for broad browser support4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Nightwatchjs
- No automatic wait2
- Less flexibility1
- Limited native mobile app support1
- Limited browser support1
- Configuration complexity1
Cons of WebdriverIO
- High maintenance8