Nightwatchjs vs Playwright

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Nightwatchjs

171
323
+ 1
11
Playwright

410
533
+ 1
76
Add tool

Nightwatchjs vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Nightwatch.js and Playwright are both popular automation testing frameworks used for testing web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Testing Framework: Nightwatch.js is built on top of Node.js and uses the WebDriver protocol for automating browsers. On the other hand, Playwright is a browser automation library that provides a high-level API for interacting with browsers. Playwright supports multiple programming languages including JavaScript, Python, and C#.

  2. Supported Browsers: Nightwatch.js supports a wide range of browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. Playwright, on the other hand, supports Chrome, Firefox, WebKit (Safari), as well as Microsoft Edge. Playwright also provides cross-browser support, allowing you to write tests that can be run on multiple browsers.

  3. Parallel Execution: Nightwatch.js supports parallel execution of tests, allowing you to run multiple tests concurrently. This can significantly reduce the overall test execution time. Playwright, on the other hand, does not have native support for parallel execution. However, you can achieve parallel execution by using additional tools or frameworks.

  4. Test Execution Speed: Playwright is generally considered to be faster compared to Nightwatch.js when it comes to test execution speed. This is due to Playwright's use of browser-specific automation backends, which eliminates the need for a WebDriver server. Nightwatch.js, on the other hand, relies on the WebDriver protocol for browser automation, which can introduce some overhead.

  5. Flexibility and Versatility: Nightwatch.js provides a built-in test runner and comes with a rich set of assertions and commands specifically designed for web application testing. It also integrates well with popular testing frameworks like Mocha and Jasmine. Playwright, on the other hand, offers a more versatile and modern approach to browser automation, allowing you to interact with not only web pages but also perform actions on iframes, web components, and more.

  6. Documentation and Community Support: While both Nightwatch.js and Playwright have decent documentation and active community support, Nightwatch.js has been around for a longer time and has a larger user community. This means that there are more resources, tutorials, and community-driven plugins available for Nightwatch.js compared to Playwright.

In summary, Nightwatch.js is more mature and has better community support, while Playwright offers cross-browser support, faster test execution, and a more modern approach to browser automation.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Nightwatchjs
Pros of Playwright
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Testing
  • 2
    Automates browsers
  • 1
    Better cross browser (use selenium)
  • 1
    Cross-Browser Testing
  • 1
    Multiple Browser Support
  • 1
    Parallel Test Running
  • 13
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Nightwatchjs
Cons of Playwright
  • 2
    No automatic wait
  • 1
    Less flexibility
  • 1
    Limited native mobile app support
  • 1
    Limited browser support
  • 1
    Configuration complexity
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Nightwatchjs?

Nightwatch.js is an easy to use Node.js based End-to-End (E2E) testing solution for browser based apps and websites. It uses the powerful Selenium WebDriver API to perform commands and assertions on DOM elements.

What is Playwright?

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Nightwatchjs?
What companies use Playwright?
See which teams inside your own company are using Nightwatchjs or Playwright.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Nightwatchjs?
What tools integrate with Playwright?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Nightwatchjs and Playwright?
WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Cypress
Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
Protractor
Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
Karma
Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
See all alternatives