StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs React-Static

Next.js vs React-Static

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
React-Static
React-Static
Stacks46
Followers114
Votes3

Next.js vs React-Static: What are the differences?

Introduction

Next.js and React-Static are both popular JavaScript frameworks used for building static and server-side rendered websites. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that can impact the decision on which one to use for a particular project. This article aims to outline these differences in a concise manner.

  1. Routing and Navigation: Next.js provides a built-in routing system that allows for easy navigation between pages by leveraging file-based routing. React-Static, on the other hand, requires the use of a separate routing library such as React Router for managing routing and navigation.

  2. Build Process: Next.js offers a zero-configuration setup, where the build process is handled automatically by the framework. React-Static, however, requires explicit configuration and build setup for generating the static files, which can be more complex for beginners.

  3. Data Fetching: Next.js provides built-in server-side rendering and data fetching capabilities. It allows for fetching data on the server before rendering the page, which can improve performance and SEO. React-Static, on the other hand, requires manual implementation for server-side rendering and data fetching.

  4. Plugins and Extensions: React-Static has a plugin-based architecture that allows for easy extensibility and customization of the build process. It provides a wide range of plugins for accomplishing various tasks, such as CSS preprocessing, image optimization, and internationalization. Next.js, on the other hand, has a more limited plugin ecosystem and may require more manual configuration for specific tasks.

  5. Developer Experience: Next.js provides a rich development experience with features like hot module reloading, automatic code splitting, and built-in typescript support. React-Static also offers a good developer experience but may require more manual configuration for advanced features.

  6. Community and Adoption: Next.js has a larger community and adoption compared to React-Static. This means that there is more community support, third-party libraries, and resources available for Next.js, making it easier to find solutions to common problems and get help when needed.

In summary, Next.js offers a more streamlined development experience with built-in routing, server-side rendering, and a wider range of community support and plugins. React-Static, on the other hand, provides more flexibility and customization options but requires more manual configuration and may have a steeper learning curve. The choice between the two frameworks ultimately depends on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, React-Static

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
React-Static
React-Static

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

React-Static is a next-gen static site generator for React. Finally, you can build a website like you do any other React App. There's no special CMS, query language, or crazy lifecycle hooks. Just good old React producing an amazing SEO-ready, user experience driven, progressively enhanced website. The effort is minimal, but the benefits are not!

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
React. Enough said;Blazing fast performance;Data Agnostic. Feed your site data from anywhere, however you want;Built for SEO, by SEO professionals;React-first developer experience;Painless project setup & migration;Supports 99.9% of the React ecosystem. Including CSS-in-JS libraries, custom Query layers like GraphQL, and even Redux!;Aggressive and flexible reloading
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
46
Followers
5.1K
Followers
114
Votes
330
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 2
    GraphQL
  • 1
    All the benefits of a static website + React+GraphQL
Cons
  • 1
    GraphQL
Integrations
React
React
React
React

What are some alternatives to Next.js, React-Static?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase