StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Mobile UI Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs React Native Material Design

Next.js vs React Native Material Design

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React Native Material Design
React Native Material Design
Stacks30
Followers135
Votes5
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Next.js vs React Native Material Design: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown, we will outline the key differences between Next.js and React Native Material Design.

  1. Programming Language: Next.js is a framework for React, written in JavaScript, while React Native Material Design is a library for creating material design components specifically for React Native applications, which uses JSX.

  2. Platform Support: Next.js is primarily targeted towards building web applications, supporting server-side rendering and static site generation, whereas React Native Material Design is focused on building mobile applications for iOS and Android using React Native.

  3. Component Library vs. Framework: React Native Material Design provides a set of pre-designed material components and styles for React Native applications, acting as a design system, while Next.js offers a comprehensive framework for building full-fledged web applications, providing tools for routing, data fetching, and more.

  4. Performance Optimization: Next.js offers features like automatic code splitting and server-side rendering to optimize performance and improve SEO for web applications, while React Native Material Design focuses on providing optimized material design components for smooth performance on mobile devices.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community, with numerous plugins and libraries available for extending its functionality, whereas React Native Material Design has a smaller but dedicated community focused on maintaining material design principles in React Native applications.

  6. Development Environment: Next.js provides a built-in development server with hot reloading capabilities for rapid development, making it easy to set up a development environment, while React Native Material Design requires setting up a development environment for React Native applications, which involves using platforms like Expo or React Native CLI for building and testing mobile apps.

In Summary, the key differences between Next.js and React Native Material Design lie in their programming language, platform support, nature of the tool (component library vs. framework), performance optimization strategies, community support, and development environment setup.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React Native Material Design, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Fronted
Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React Native Material Design
React Native Material Design
Next.js
Next.js

An open source project which aims to bring Material Design to Android through React Native by Facebook. The library is made up of many components, which can be found in the sidebar.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

-
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
30
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
135
Followers
5.1K
Votes
5
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Unmaintained
  • 1
    Android-only
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
React Native
React Native
React
React

What are some alternatives to React Native Material Design, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase