Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Neo4j vs Redis: What are the differences?
Neo4j vs Redis
Neo4j and Redis are two popular database management systems, each with its own unique features and strengths. Here are the key differences between Neo4j and Redis:
Data Model: Neo4j is a graph database that represents data in a graph structure, consisting of nodes and relationships. It is highly suited for managing complex relationships and performing graph-based operations efficiently. On the other hand, Redis is a key-value store that stores data with a simple key-value pair structure. It excels in caching and real-time data processing applications.
Scalability: Neo4j is designed to handle large-scale graph datasets efficiently, with the ability to scale horizontally across multiple machines. It provides built-in clustering and partitioning mechanisms to distribute data across a cluster. In contrast, Redis is known for its exceptional performance and can handle high write and read loads. It supports replication and sharding for scalability, but it is not specifically built for handling large-scale datasets as in Neo4j.
Query Language: Neo4j uses the Cypher query language, which is specifically designed for querying graph structures. Cypher provides a declarative way of expressing complex graph operations and supports pattern matching, traversal, and aggregation. Redis, on the other hand, supports various data access patterns and provides a rich set of commands for operations like set, get, increment, and more. It does not have a dedicated query language like Cypher.
Data Manipulation: Neo4j provides a comprehensive set of operations for creating, updating, and deleting nodes, relationships, and properties in the graph. It supports transactional operations, ensuring data integrity. Redis, on the other hand, supports atomic operations for data manipulation, allowing multiple commands to be executed as a single operation. However, it does not have built-in support for complex data manipulation like Neo4j.
Data Persistence: Neo4j persists data to disk by default, ensuring durability and data integrity. It provides ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) guarantees for transactions. Redis, on the other hand, is an in-memory database that can optionally persist data to disk. It offers different levels of persistence durability based on configuration settings but does not provide strong ACID guarantees.
Use Cases: Neo4j is well-suited for applications that involve complex relationships and require graph operations like recommendations, fraud detection, social networks, and network analysis. Its graph model allows for efficient traversals and querying of connected data. Redis, on the other hand, is widely used for caching, session management, real-time analytics, and pub/sub messaging. It excels in scenarios that require high-performance data access and data manipulation capabilities.
In summary, Neo4j is a graph database that excels in managing complex relationships and performing graph operations efficiently, while Redis is a versatile key-value store that is highly performant and offers various data access patterns. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the application and the nature of the data being managed.
Hi, I want to create a social network for students, and I was wondering which of these three Oriented Graph DB's would you recommend. I plan to implement machine learning algorithms such as k-means and others to give recommendations and some basic data analyses; also, everything is going to be hosted in the cloud, so I expect the DB to be hosted there. I want the queries to be as fast as possible, and I like good tools to monitor my data. I would appreciate any recommendations or thoughts.
Context:
I released the MVP 6 months ago and got almost 600 users just from my university in Colombia, But now I want to expand it all over my country. I am expecting more or less 20000 users.
I have not used the others but I agree, ArangoDB should meet your needs. If you have worked with RDBMS and SQL before Arango will be a easy transition. AQL is simple yet powerful and deployment can be as small or large as you need. I love the fact that for my local development I can run it as docker container as part of my project and for production I can have multiple machines in a cluster. The project is also under active development and with the latest round of funding I feel comfortable that it will be around a while.
Hi Jaime. I've worked with Neo4j and ArangoDB for a few years and for me, I prefer to use ArangoDB because its query sintax (AQL) is easier. I've built a network topology with both databases and now ArangoDB is the databases for that network topology. Also, ArangoDB has ArangoML that maybe can help you with your recommendation algorithims.
Hi Jaime, I work with Arango for about 3 years quite a lot. Before I do some investigation and choose ArangoDB against Neo4j due to multi-type DB, speed, and also clustering (but we do not use it now). Now we have RMDB and Graph working together. As others said, AQL is quite easy, but u can use some of the drivers like Java Spring, that get you to another level.. If you prefer more copy-paste with little rework, perhaps Neo4j can do the job for you, because there is a bigger community around it.. But I have to solve some issues with the ArangoDB community and its also fast. So I will preffere ArangoDB... Btw, there is a super easy Foxx Microservice tool on Arango that can help you solve basic things faster than write down robust BackEnd.
Pros of Neo4j
- Cypher – graph query language69
- Great graphdb61
- Open source33
- Rest api31
- High-Performance Native API27
- ACID23
- Easy setup21
- Great support17
- Clustering11
- Hot Backups9
- Great Web Admin UI8
- Powerful, flexible data model7
- Mature7
- Embeddable6
- Easy to Use and Model5
- Highly-available4
- Best Graphdb4
- It's awesome, I wanted to try it2
- Great onboarding process2
- Great query language and built in data browser2
- Used by Crunchbase2
Pros of Redis
- Performance887
- Super fast542
- Ease of use514
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable165
- Free156
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Pub/Sub23
- Great community22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- Lists10
- NoSQL10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Bitmaps8
- Open Source7
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Runs server side LUA4
- Transactions4
- Networked4
- Outstanding performance4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Scalable2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Neo4j
- Comparably slow9
- Can't store a vertex as JSON4
- Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost1
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1