Nemo.js vs Sauce Labs

Overview

Sauce Labs

Stacks314

Followers435

Votes439

Nemo.js

Stacks3

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars8

Forks4

Nemo.js vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Programming Language Compatibility: Nemo.js is written in JavaScript and can be used with Node.js environment, while Sauce Labs supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Java, and Ruby, providing more flexibility for users.
Logging and Reporting: Nemo.js supports custom logging and reporting features, allowing users to generate detailed reports and logs during test execution, whereas Sauce Labs has its own built-in reporting tools and dashboards for analysis and monitoring of test results.
Browser and Device Support: Nemo.js primarily focuses on testing web applications across various browsers and devices, including mobile browsers, while Sauce Labs also supports testing on emulators, simulators, and real devices, offering a wider range of testing environments.
Integration with CI/CD Tools: Nemo.js seamlessly integrates with popular Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, enabling automated testing within the CI/CD pipeline, whereas Sauce Labs provides native integrations with various CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Bamboo, and TeamCity for streamlined automation workflows.
Community Support and Documentation: Nemo.js has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support through forums and documentation, whereas Sauce Labs offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and customer support to help users navigate their platform effectively.
Test Automation Capabilities: Nemo.js is primarily focused on functional testing of web applications, while Sauce Labs offers a broader spectrum of testing capabilities, including performance testing, visual testing, and API testing, making it a comprehensive solution for various testing needs.

In Summary, Nemo.js and Sauce Labs differ in terms of programming language compatibility, logging and reporting features, browser and device support, integration with CI/CD tools, community support, and test automation capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, Nemo.js

Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Selenium

Sauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k

Comments

Sharada

Aug 5, 2021

Needs advice

Looking for some advice on which tool to use for mobile testing. We need the following requirements fulfilled: 1. Instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts. 2. iOS and Android devices to be available to a large team (around 60). 3. Good performance of the devices.

5.85k views5.85k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs	Nemo.js
Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.	Nemo provides a simple way to add selenium automation to your NodeJS web projects. Provides plugin architecture to incorporate custom features to your tests.
700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs	Nemo.js wraps around the ubiquitous Selenium WebDriver, and as such, allows control of virtually any browser on any operating system;Built with a plugin architecture;Easy interface for authoring new plugins that can then be shared with others
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 8
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4
Stacks 314	Stacks 3
Followers 435	Followers 24
Votes 439	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 60 Selenium-compatible 46 Webdriver compatible 35 Video recordings of every test 31 Qa 29 Mobile support Cons 2 Expensive 2 Relatively slow	No community feedback yet
Integrations
CircleCI Travis CI Appium Jenkins Selenium Visual Studio AWS Cloud9 TeamCity Applitools Bamboo	Selenium

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, Nemo.js?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

Nemo.js vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Programming Language Compatibility: Nemo.js is written in JavaScript and can be used with Node.js environment, while Sauce Labs supports multiple programming languages, including JavaScript, Python, Java, and Ruby, providing more flexibility for users.
Logging and Reporting: Nemo.js supports custom logging and reporting features, allowing users to generate detailed reports and logs during test execution, whereas Sauce Labs has its own built-in reporting tools and dashboards for analysis and monitoring of test results.
Browser and Device Support: Nemo.js primarily focuses on testing web applications across various browsers and devices, including mobile browsers, while Sauce Labs also supports testing on emulators, simulators, and real devices, offering a wider range of testing environments.
Integration with CI/CD Tools: Nemo.js seamlessly integrates with popular Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools like Jenkins, Travis CI, and CircleCI, enabling automated testing within the CI/CD pipeline, whereas Sauce Labs provides native integrations with various CI/CD tools such as Jenkins, Bamboo, and TeamCity for streamlined automation workflows.
Community Support and Documentation: Nemo.js has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support through forums and documentation, whereas Sauce Labs offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and customer support to help users navigate their platform effectively.
Test Automation Capabilities: Nemo.js is primarily focused on functional testing of web applications, while Sauce Labs offers a broader spectrum of testing capabilities, including performance testing, visual testing, and API testing, making it a comprehensive solution for various testing needs.

Nemo.js vs Sauce Labs

Overview