StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. MySQL vs Neo4j

MySQL vs Neo4j

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MySQL
MySQL
Stacks129.6K
Followers108.6K
Votes3.8K
GitHub Stars11.8K
Forks4.1K
Neo4j
Neo4j
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.4K
Votes351
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.5K

MySQL vs Neo4j: What are the differences?

Introduction

MySQL and Neo4j are both widely used database management systems, but they have significant differences in terms of their data model and query language.

  1. Data Model

    • MySQL: MySQL is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that organizes data in tables with rows and columns. It represents relationships between entities using foreign keys and joins tables for fetching related data.
    • Neo4j: Neo4j is a graph database management system that represents data as nodes, relationships, and properties. It provides a flexible data model to represent complex relationships between entities.
  2. Query Language

    • MySQL: MySQL uses SQL (Structured Query Language) as its query language, which is a standard language for managing relational databases. It supports complex joins, aggregations, and transactions.
    • Neo4j: Neo4j uses Cypher as its query language, which is specifically designed for graph databases. Cypher allows developers to express complex graph traversals, pattern matching, and filtering.
  3. Scalability

    • MySQL: MySQL scales vertically by adding more resources to a single server. It can handle large amounts of data, but performance may degrade as the data grows.
    • Neo4j: Neo4j scales horizontally by distributing data across multiple machines. It can handle large graphs with billions of nodes and relationships, providing better performance for connected data.
  4. Flexibility

    • MySQL: MySQL is highly structured and enforces strict data schemas. It is suitable for applications with well-defined relationships and consistent data representations.
    • Neo4j: Neo4j is schema-optional, allowing the flexibility to model data with varying relationships. It is well-suited for applications with dynamic or evolving data structures.
  5. Performance for Relationship-centric Queries

    • MySQL: MySQL can efficiently handle simple join queries and aggregations. However, complex queries involving multiple joins across large tables can be slower and require careful optimization.
    • Neo4j: Neo4j excels in relationship-centric queries due to its graph structure. It can traverse relationships efficiently, enabling faster and more intuitive querying of connected data.
  6. Community and Ecosystem

    • MySQL: MySQL has a large and mature community with extensive documentation, active forums, and a wide range of third-party libraries and tools. It is widely adopted and integrated with various frameworks and applications.
    • Neo4j: Neo4j has a growing community with good developer support. While not as extensive as MySQL, it offers a range of libraries, drivers, and plugins to integrate with popular programming languages and frameworks.

In Summary, MySQL is a relational database management system with a structured data model and SQL query language, while Neo4j is a graph database management system with a flexible data model and Cypher query language. MySQL emphasizes structured data and performs well in simple join queries, while Neo4j excels in complex relationship-centric queries and provides better scalability for connected data. Both have active communities and ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on MySQL, Neo4j

Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Redacted DevWorks

Dec 3, 2019

DecidedonPostGISPostGIS

While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.

MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.

It was very disappointing.

I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.

I was very disappointed.

Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.

449k views449k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Navraj
Navraj

CEO at SuPragma

Apr 16, 2020

Needs adviceonMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I asked my last question incorrectly. Rephrasing it here.

I am looking for the most secure open source database for my project I'm starting: https://github.com/SuPragma/SuPragma/wiki

Which database is more secure? MySQL or PostgreSQL? Are there others I should be considering? Is it possible to change the encryption keys dynamically?

Thanks,

Raj

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MySQL
MySQL
Neo4j
Neo4j

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions.

-
intuitive, using a graph model for data representation;reliable, with full ACID transactions;durable and fast, using a custom disk-based, native storage engine;massively scalable, up to several billion nodes/relationships/properties;highly-available, when distributed across multiple machines;expressive, with a powerful, human readable graph query language;fast, with a powerful traversal framework for high-speed graph queries;embeddable, with a few small jars;simple, accessible by a convenient REST interface or an object-oriented Java API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.8K
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
129.6K
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
108.6K
Followers
1.4K
Votes
3.8K
Votes
351
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 800
    Sql
  • 679
    Free
  • 562
    Easy
  • 528
    Widely used
  • 490
    Open source
Cons
  • 16
    Owned by a company with their own agenda
  • 3
    Can't roll back schema changes
Pros
  • 69
    Cypher – graph query language
  • 61
    Great graphdb
  • 33
    Open source
  • 31
    Rest api
  • 27
    High-Performance Native API
Cons
  • 9
    Comparably slow
  • 4
    Can't store a vertex as JSON
  • 1
    Doesn't have a managed cloud service at low cost

What are some alternatives to MySQL, Neo4j?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase