StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. MyGet vs NuGet

MyGet vs NuGet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NuGet
NuGet
Stacks10.2K
Followers172
Votes0
MyGet
MyGet
Stacks17
Followers9
Votes0

MyGet vs NuGet: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference 1: Availability and Source - One major difference between MyGet and NuGet is their availability and source. MyGet is a cloud-based package manager, whereas NuGet is a package manager built into the Microsoft-developed IDEs such as Visual Studio. This means that MyGet can be accessed from anywhere with an internet connection, while NuGet is limited to the specific IDEs it is integrated with.

  2. Key Difference 2: Repository Types - Another significant difference lies in the repository types supported by MyGet and NuGet. MyGet allows users to create both public and private repositories, giving them more control over who can access the packages. On the other hand, NuGet primarily focuses on public repositories, making it more suitable for sharing and distributing packages with the wider development community.

  3. Key Difference 3: Package Feeds - MyGet offers various types of package feeds, including NuGet feeds, Npm feeds, and even Bower feeds. This means that users can manage packages from different package managers within MyGet. In contrast, NuGet only supports NuGet feeds, limiting the package management capabilities exclusively to the Microsoft ecosystem.

  4. Key Difference 4: Workflow and Collaboration - The workflow and collaboration features differ between MyGet and NuGet. MyGet provides features such as build services, package promotion, and the ability to add collaborators, enabling a more streamlined and collaborative development process. NuGet, on the other hand, focuses primarily on package distribution and does not offer extensive built-in collaboration features.

  5. Key Difference 5: Pricing and Licensing - MyGet offers both free and paid plans, allowing users to choose the option that best fits their needs. The paid plans provide additional features and increased storage capacity. NuGet, being an open-source package manager, is free to use, and there are no licensing fees associated with it.

  6. Key Difference 6: Support and Customization - When it comes to support and customization, MyGet provides dedicated customer support for its users, with options to purchase premium support plans for enhanced assistance. Furthermore, MyGet offers customization options such as custom domain names and branding. NuGet, being a more standardized package manager, does not offer dedicated support or customization options beyond the basic functionality provided by Microsoft.

In Summary, MyGet and NuGet differ in their availability and source, repository types supported, package feeds, workflow and collaboration features, pricing and licensing, as well as support and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

NuGet
NuGet
MyGet
MyGet

A free and open-source package manager designed for the Microsoft development platform. It is also distributed as a Visual Studio extension.

It allows you to create and host your own NuGet feed. Include packages from the official NuGet feed or upload your own NuGet packages. We can also compile and package your source code from GitHub, BitBucket, CodePlex and more!

-
All your packages in a single endpoint; Continuous Integration: Build Services; Continuous Security: Vulnerability Scanning; Package Dependency Management; Cloud Native & Enterprise Scale; Secure by Design
Statistics
Stacks
10.2K
Stacks
17
Followers
172
Followers
9
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 0
    Best package (and maybe only 1) management for .NET
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
.NET
.NET
PHP
PHP
npm
npm
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Bower
Bower
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to NuGet, MyGet?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana