StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Mustache vs Nunjucks

Mustache vs Nunjucks

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mustache
Mustache
Stacks2.4K
Followers415
Votes50
GitHub Stars16.7K
Forks2.4K
Nunjucks
Nunjucks
Stacks86
Followers91
Votes6
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks647

Mustache vs Nunjucks: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Mustache and Nunjucks, highlighting the key differences between the two templating engines.

  1. Syntax: Mustache uses a simple and minimalistic syntax, with tags represented by double curly braces ({{}}) for variables and triple curly braces ({{{}}}) for unescaped content. On the other hand, Nunjucks has a more powerful and expressive syntax that includes conditional statements, loops, and macros, with tags represented by {% %} for control flow and {{}} for variables.

  2. Extensibility: Nunjucks is more extensible than Mustache, allowing the use of custom filters, functions, and tags. This enables developers to create their own logic and functionality within templates, making Nunjucks suitable for more complex scenarios. Mustache, on the other hand, has a limited set of predefined functionality and does not support custom extensions by default.

  3. Error Handling: Nunjucks provides more detailed error messages compared to Mustache. When an error occurs in the template, Nunjucks offers specific information about the error location, making it easier to debug and identify the issue. Mustache, on the other hand, provides less informative error messages and may require more effort to troubleshoot problems.

  4. Whitespace Control: Mustache treats all whitespace as significant, including newlines and indentation. Nunjucks, however, offers more control over whitespace by allowing developers to strip unnecessary whitespace from the rendered template, making it easier to maintain clean and readable HTML output.

  5. Template Inheritance: Nunjucks supports template inheritance, which allows developers to create a base template with common sections and define child templates that extend and override specific sections. This feature is not available natively in Mustache, making Nunjucks more suitable for developing complex layouts or reusable components.

  6. Usage Complexity: Mustache is simpler and easier to learn and use, with less complexity in terms of syntax and features. It provides a straightforward and minimalistic approach to templating, making it suitable for simple rendering tasks. On the other hand, Nunjucks offers more advanced features and flexibility, but this also introduces greater complexity, requiring more familiarity and experience to use effectively.

In Summary, Mustache and Nunjucks differ in syntax, extensibility, error handling, whitespace control, template inheritance, and usage complexity. Mustache offers a simpler syntax and is easier to use, while Nunjucks provides a more powerful and extensible templating engine with advanced features and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mustache
Mustache
Nunjucks
Nunjucks

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Rich Powerful language with block inheritance, autoescaping, macros, asynchronous control, and more. Heavily inspired by jinja2. It supports all modern browsers.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.7K
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
647
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
86
Followers
415
Followers
91
Votes
50
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 29
    Dead simple templating
  • 12
    Open source
  • 8
    Small
  • 1
    Support in lots of languages
Pros
  • 4
    Supported by Mozilla
  • 2
    Easy sintaxis like JS
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Firefox
Firefox

What are some alternatives to Mustache, Nunjucks?

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Slim Lang

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

RactiveJS

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

EJS

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Jinja

Jinja

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Twig

Twig

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

Hogan.js

Hogan.js

Hogan.js is a 3.4k JS templating engine developed at Twitter. Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time or include it in your browser to handle dynamic templates.

Jsonnet

Jsonnet

It is a data templating language for app and tool developers. It is a powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase