StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Text Editor
  5. Monaco Editor vs Visual Studio Code

Monaco Editor vs Visual Studio Code

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Stacks186.5K
Followers169.1K
Votes2.3K
GitHub Stars178.2K
Forks35.9K
Monaco Editor
Monaco Editor
Stacks57
Followers172
Votes17
GitHub Stars44.5K
Forks3.9K

Monaco Editor vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Monaco Editor and Visual Studio Code are both popular code editors widely used by developers. While both of them have similar features and functionalities, there are some key differences between the two.

1. Syntax Highlighting and IntelliSense:

Monaco Editor provides excellent syntax highlighting and IntelliSense capabilities. It offers a wide range of language support out of the box and provides suggestions, auto-completion, and context-aware code snippets, making it easier for developers to write code efficiently.

Visual Studio Code also provides robust syntax highlighting and IntelliSense features. However, one key difference is that Visual Studio Code supports a larger number of programming languages and offers more advanced IntelliSense options. It also has better support for debugging and code navigation compared to Monaco Editor.

2. Extensibility and Customization:

Visual Studio Code has a strong emphasis on extensibility and customization. It provides a marketplace with a wide variety of extensions that developers can use to enhance their code editing experience. These extensions can add additional features, support for different programming languages, and integration with external tools and services.

Monaco Editor, on the other hand, is designed to be lightweight and embeddable. It lacks the extensive extension ecosystem of Visual Studio Code and does not have the same level of customization options. While it can be customized to some extent, it does not offer the same level of flexibility as Visual Studio Code.

3. Integrated Terminal:

Visual Studio Code comes with an integrated terminal, allowing developers to run commands and scripts directly from the editor. This can be handy for tasks like building, testing, and debugging code without having to switch between different applications.

Monaco Editor, on the other hand, does not have an integrated terminal feature. Developers using Monaco Editor would need to rely on external terminals or command-line interfaces to run commands and scripts.

4. Collaboration and Live Editing:

Monaco Editor has built-in support for collaboration and live editing. It allows multiple users to work on the same file simultaneously, with real-time synchronization of changes. This can be useful for pair programming or remote team collaboration, as it provides a seamless experience for developers to work together on code.

Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, does not have native support for real-time collaboration. While there are extensions available that enable collaboration features, it is not as seamlessly integrated as Monaco Editor's built-in collaboration capabilities.

5. Cloud-based Editing:

Monaco Editor can be used as part of the web-based code editors like Visual Studio Codespaces or GitHub Codespaces. This allows developers to edit code in the cloud without the need for installing any local development environment. It provides a lightweight and accessible way to work on code from anywhere, using just a web browser.

Visual Studio Code, while having some remote development capabilities, primarily relies on being installed locally on a developer's machine. It provides a more comprehensive set of features and integrations for local development scenarios, but does not have the same level of cloud-based editing capabilities as Monaco Editor.

6. Performance and Resource Usage:

Monaco Editor is known for its lightweight and fast performance. It is optimized to handle large codebases and provides a smooth editing experience, even with complex projects. It has a smaller memory footprint compared to Visual Studio Code, making it suitable for scenarios where resource usage needs to be minimized.

Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is a more feature-rich editor that can consume more system resources, especially when working with large projects. While it provides powerful tools and functionalities, it may require a more powerful machine to ensure smooth performance.

Summary:

In summary, Monaco Editor is a lightweight and embeddable code editor that provides excellent syntax highlighting and IntelliSense capabilities, with built-in support for collaboration and cloud-based editing. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, offers more extensive customization options, a larger extension ecosystem, integrated terminals, and stronger support for advanced features like debugging and code navigation. Choose Monaco Editor for a lightweight and efficient development experience, or Visual Studio Code for a more customizable and feature-rich editing environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Visual Studio Code, Monaco Editor

Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.

Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.

1.36M views1.36M
Comments
Samriddhi
Samriddhi

Machine Learning Engineer at Chefling

Sep 26, 2020

Decided

Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.

1.04M views1.04M
Comments
410-Ventures
410-Ventures

Nov 18, 2020

Review

PyCharm (pro)

  • great editor designed specifically for Python and python apps
  • complex (good for configurability, bad for simplicity)
  • expensive ($200 first year, $120 third year)

PyCharm (free)

  • same as above but without a REST client or support for other web development tools (which you will likely end up using)
  • ok to get your feet wet (you can always upgrade later) Full comparison: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/features/editions_comparison_matrix.html

VS Code (free)

  • Configurable "IDE" with support for most modern languages
  • TONS of simple-to-install extensions that add functionality
  • Great docs and UI

Sublime Text (free)

  • one of the most minimal editors out there
  • it just works

It's really down to personal preference. But I would recommend downloading all of the FREE editors, getting setup in each, and keeping only the ones you like.

My personal choice for web development is VS Code but I started with Pycharm (free), and use Sublime text on occasion.

Just focus on learning and developing and you will find what features you're looking for.

12.1k views12.1k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Monaco Editor
Monaco Editor

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

The Monaco Editor is the code editor that powers VS Code. It is licensed under the MIT License and supports IE 9/10/11, Edge, Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Opera.

Combines UI of a modern editor with code assistance and navigation; Integrated debugging experience
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
178.2K
GitHub Stars
44.5K
GitHub Forks
35.9K
GitHub Forks
3.9K
Stacks
186.5K
Stacks
57
Followers
169.1K
Followers
172
Votes
2.3K
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 341
    Powerful multilanguage IDE
  • 310
    Fast
  • 194
    Front-end develop out of the box
  • 158
    Support TypeScript IntelliSense
  • 142
    Very basic but free
Cons
  • 46
    Slow startup
  • 29
    Resource hog at times
  • 20
    Poor refactoring
  • 14
    Poor UI Designer
  • 11
    Weak Ui design tools
Pros
  • 6
    Out of the Box Intellisense
  • 4
    More features than Ace
  • 3
    Power vscode, with all it's features
  • 2
    Microsoft Product
  • 1
    Accessibility
Cons
  • 7
    Microsoft
Integrations
No integrations available
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Safari
Safari
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to Visual Studio Code, Monaco Editor?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Atom

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Notepad++

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

VSCodium

VSCodium

It is a community-driven, freely-licensed binary distribution of Microsoft’s editor VSCode.

TextMate

TextMate

TextMate brings Apple's approach to operating systems into the world of text editors. By bridging UNIX underpinnings and GUI, TextMate cherry-picks the best of both worlds to the benefit of expert scripters and novice users alike.

gedit

gedit

gedit is the GNOME text editor. While aiming at simplicity and ease of use, gedit is a powerful general purpose text editor.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana