MobX vs Redux Dynamic Modules vs Redux.js: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. State Management: MobX allows for a more flexible state management approach by directly modifying and observing state objects, while Redux Dynamic Modules and Redux.js adhere to a strict unidirectional data flow and require actions and reducers to update the state.

2. Learning Curve: MobX is generally considered easier to learn and use due to its simpler concepts and less boilerplate code compared to Redux Dynamic Modules and Redux.js, which require a better understanding of actions, reducers, and the store setup.

3. Community Support: Redux Dynamic Modules and Redux.js have a larger and more established community support with a wide range of third-party libraries and tools available, while MobX has a smaller community with relatively fewer resources and plugins.

4. Immutability: Redux Dynamic Modules and Redux.js emphasize immutability and immutable updates to the state to maintain predictability and enable efficient change detection, whereas MobX allows for mutable state updates which might introduce unintended side effects.

5. Performance: MobX is known for its efficient reactivity system which only updates components that are directly affected by state changes, leading to better performance compared to Redux Dynamic Modules and Redux.js, which may re-render more components even if they are not impacted by the state change.

6. Development Ecosystem: Redux Dynamic Modules and Redux.js offer a more structured and opinionated development ecosystem with tools like Redux DevTools for debugging and middleware support, while MobX provides flexibility but requires more manual configuration for advanced features like time-travel debugging.

In Summary, <Write summary here>