Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Microsoft Teams

2.4K
1.7K
+ 1
144
RocketChat

372
542
+ 1
324
Add tool

Microsoft Teams vs RocketChat: What are the differences?

Introduction

Microsoft Teams and RocketChat are both popular communication and collaboration tools used by teams and organizations. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of features, functionality, and integrations.

  1. Integration with Microsoft ecosystem: The main advantage of Microsoft Teams is its seamless integration with other Microsoft tools and services such as Office 365, SharePoint, and Outlook. This allows users to access and collaborate on files, documents, and appointments directly within the Teams platform. On the other hand, RocketChat offers a wide range of integrations with various third-party services, making it a flexible option for teams using different software tools.

  2. License and cost: Microsoft Teams is available as part of the Office 365 suite, with different plans and pricing options depending on the organization's needs. RocketChat, on the other hand, is an open-source platform that can be downloaded and installed for free, making it a more cost-effective solution for smaller teams or organizations on a tight budget.

  3. Customization and extensibility: RocketChat provides a highly customizable and extensible platform with access to the source code, allowing teams to modify and tailor the software to their specific requirements. Microsoft Teams, while offering some customization options, has more limited extensibility compared to RocketChat.

  4. User interface and user experience: Microsoft Teams has a sleek and user-friendly interface, with an emphasis on simplicity and intuitive navigation. It offers a polished user experience, especially for users already familiar with the Microsoft Office suite. RocketChat, on the other hand, has a slightly less refined user interface but offers a more flexible layout and customization options for individuals who prefer a more personalized experience.

  5. Video conferencing and calling features: Both Microsoft Teams and RocketChat offer video conferencing and calling capabilities, but Microsoft Teams has the advantage of natively integrating with other Microsoft tools such as Skype for Business. This integration provides a more seamless and familiar experience for users already using Skype.

  6. Security and compliance: Microsoft Teams has robust security measures in place, including data encryption, multi-factor authentication, and compliance with industry standards such as ISO 27001 and HIPAA. RocketChat also offers security features like two-factor authentication, GDPR compliance, and end-to-end encryption but may require additional configuration and customization depending on the deployment environment.

In summary, Microsoft Teams stands out for its tight integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, user-friendly interface, and video conferencing capabilities, while RocketChat offers more customization options, cost-effectiveness, and a wide range of integrations with third-party services. Ultimately, the choice between the two platforms depends on the specific needs and preferences of the team or organization.

Decisions about Microsoft Teams and RocketChat
Christopher Semmler
CEO at Leonis Holding · | 3 upvotes · 48K views

Mattermost sports higher performance, uses Postgres, is a pure server side application not using up too much of system resources on the client side, and gives an overall enterprise grade impression in general.

Updates go smooth without a hassle, everything is organised logically, and the integration with the OS is absolutely stable. Apart from that, the underlying runtimes and code are mature, proven and stable.

The developers are maybe a bit more cautious in regard to introducing new features, but they maintain a stable experience, not breaking the codebase in order to hastily implement bells and whistles, which are not yet ready for production. Documentation and debugging are fantastic, so running this in enterprise production environment is absolutely approved of.

See more

As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.

See more
Hirotaka Ishihara
Undergrad at University of Toronto · | 3 upvotes · 191.3K views

Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.

  • Slack

We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.

  • Microsoft Teams

We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.

See more
Stefan Schuchlenz

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

See more
Mohammad Hossein Amri
Chief Technology Officer at Planally · | 3 upvotes · 264.8K views

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Microsoft Teams
Pros of RocketChat
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
  • 10
    Channels
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Unlimited users
  • 5
    Strong search and data archiving
  • 5
    Easy to integrate with
  • 4
    Web interface
  • 4
    Multi domain switching support
  • 3
    Same interface on multiple platforms
  • 2
    Great voice quality
  • 72
    Open source
  • 38
    Can be deployed on premise
  • 32
    Byos (bring your own server)
  • 30
    Faster than Slack
  • 21
    Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch
  • 19
    Built using meteor
  • 19
    Desktop client for mac and windows
  • 13
    Easily deployed on Cloud Services (Heroku, etc)
  • 10
    Screen Sharing
  • 9
    Excellent support & service, bar-none
  • 9
    Video and audio
  • 6
    Web client
  • 5
    Mobile app for android phone, tablet, and tv stick
  • 5
    Docker Image for easy setup
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Multiple Security integrations - LDAP etc
  • 5
    Amazing product, fast moving development, and BYOS
  • 4
    Great development team
  • 4
    Free
  • 4
    Datacontrol
  • 2
    Love it - running on R Pi 2
  • 2
    Open source server
  • 1
    Slack bridge
  • 1
    Broadcast & Readonly channels
  • 1
    Linux Client Support
  • 1
    Flexible Integrations
  • 1
    Ldap integration
  • 0
  • 0
    Threading model

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Microsoft Teams
Cons of RocketChat
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
  • 5
    Unable to Mute users
  • 5
    No Markdown Support
  • 4
    You don't really own your messages
  • 4
    MIssing public channels
  • 4
    Forced WYSIWYG
  • 3
    Stubborn, unused friendly
  • 3
    Challenging Onboarding
  • 3
    No linux support
  • 1
    Audio support problems
  • 1
    No full markdown support
  • 1
    Mobile app in Enterprise version only
  • 1
    Many basic features require plugins
  • 1
    Visioconference support is external
  • 1
    No screen recorder
  • 1
    Few options for user customization
  • 1
    Limited message history on SaaS
  • 1
    Poor user customization
  • 1
    Hard to upgrade
  • 1
    Not as well-known as others like it

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Microsoft Teams?

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

What is RocketChat?

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Microsoft Teams?
What companies use RocketChat?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Microsoft Teams?
What tools integrate with RocketChat?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Microsoft Teams and RocketChat?
Slack
Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.
Skype
Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.
Microsoft SharePoint
It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.
Yammer
Yammer brings the power of social networking to your company. Collaborate securely across departments, geographies, content and business applications.
Confluence
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
See all alternatives