StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. File Storage
  5. SharePoint vs Syncthing

SharePoint vs Syncthing

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Stacks442
Followers314
Votes7
Syncthing
Syncthing
Stacks48
Followers78
Votes2
GitHub Stars77.3K
Forks4.8K

SharePoint vs Syncthing: What are the differences?

Key Differences between SharePoint and Syncthing

SharePoint and Syncthing are two different systems with different purposes and functionalities. Below are the key differences between SharePoint and Syncthing:

  1. Architecture: SharePoint is a centralized content management system developed by Microsoft. It relies on a server-client architecture, where documents and data are stored and managed on a central server. On the other hand, Syncthing is a decentralized file synchronization system that works peer-to-peer. It allows multiple devices to synchronize files directly with each other, without the need for a central server.

  2. Collaboration Features: SharePoint is designed with collaboration in mind and provides a wide range of collaborative features. It offers features like document co-authoring, version control, document workflows, real-time collaboration, and integration with other Microsoft products like Teams and Office 365. Syncthing, however, is primarily focused on file synchronization between devices and lacks the extensive collaboration features found in SharePoint.

  3. Security and Access Control: SharePoint provides robust security features and allows administrators to define access control policies at various levels, including site, library, and document level. It supports authentication mechanisms like Active Directory integration and allows granular control over user permissions. On the other hand, Syncthing lacks the same level of sophisticated security features found in SharePoint. While Syncthing does offer basic access control options, they are not as comprehensive or customizable as SharePoint.

  4. Integration with Third-Party Systems: SharePoint integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft products and services, such as Office 365, OneDrive, Outlook, and Microsoft Teams. It also supports integration with external systems through APIs and connectors. In contrast, Syncthing is mainly focused on file synchronization and does not offer the same level of integration options as SharePoint.

  5. Deployment and Scalability: SharePoint is a complex system that requires dedicated servers and infrastructure for deployment, making it more suitable for large organizations. It allows for horizontal scalability by adding additional servers to handle increased workloads. Syncthing, on the other hand, is a lightweight and flexible file synchronization tool that can easily be deployed on individual devices or small networks, making it suitable for personal or small-scale use.

  6. Cost: SharePoint is a commercial product that requires licensing and often involves significant costs for deployment, maintenance, and user subscriptions. In contrast, Syncthing is an open-source project available under the GNU General Public License, meaning it is free to use, modify, and redistribute without any licensing fees.

In Summary, SharePoint is a centralized content management system designed for collaboration, providing extensive features and integration options but comes with a cost. Syncthing, on the other hand, is a decentralized file synchronization tool focused on simplicity, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Syncthing
Syncthing

It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.

It is a continuous file synchronization program. It synchronizes files between two or more computers and replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and decentralized. Your data is your data alone and you deserve to choose where it is stored, if it is shared with some third party and how it's transmitted over the internet.

Authentication; Business Intelligence; Web Content Management
Configure and monitor Syncthing via a responsive and powerful interface accessible via your browser; Portable; Synchronize as many folders as you need with different people
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
77.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
442
Stacks
48
Followers
314
Followers
78
Votes
7
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Great online support
  • 1
    Perfect version control
  • 1
    Secure
  • 1
    Seamless intergration with MS Office
  • 1
    Stable Platform
Cons
  • 2
    Rigid, hard to add external applicaions
  • 1
    User interface. Steep learning curve, old-fashioned
Pros
  • 1
    Convenient to use
  • 1
    Offline
Cons
  • 1
    Not intuitive how to set up on a headless machine
Integrations
Jira
Jira
Slack
Slack
Linux
Linux
OpenBSD
OpenBSD
Windows
Windows
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
FreeBSD
FreeBSD

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SharePoint, Syncthing?

Google Drive

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Dropbox

Dropbox

Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.

Box

Box

The Box API gives you access to the content management features you see in our web app and lets you extend them for use in your own app. It strives to be RESTful and is organized around the main resources you’re familiar with from the Box web interface.

HackPad

HackPad

Hackpad is a smart collaborative workspace that your team will love.

Quip

Quip

Edit and discuss in one place. Quip combines documents with messages so you can work faster, on the web or on the go.

Nextcloud

Nextcloud

A suite of client-server software for creating and using file hosting services The most deployed self-hosted file share and collaboration platform on the web. Access & collaborate across your devices.

ceph

ceph

In computing,It is a free-software storage platform, implements object storage on a single distributed computer cluster, and provides interfaces for object-, block- and file-level storage.

Google Docs

Google Docs

It is a word processor included as part of a free, web-based software office suite offered by Google. It brings your documents to life with smart editing and styling tools to help you easily format text and paragraphs.

OneDrive

OneDrive

Outlook.com is a free, personal email service from Microsoft. Keep your inbox clutter-free with powerful organizational tools, and collaborate easily with OneDrive and Office Online integration.

Dropmark

Dropmark

Dropmark offers super simple drag-and-drop file sharing, like a number of web apps before it, but if you want to use it for more you can create presentations, slideshows, and collaborate with others just as easily.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase