StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. File Storage
  5. Microsoft Access vs Microsoft SharePoint

Microsoft Access vs Microsoft SharePoint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Stacks442
Followers314
Votes7
Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access
Stacks83
Followers87
Votes0

Microsoft Access vs Microsoft SharePoint: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Microsoft Access and Microsoft SharePoint

Microsoft Access and Microsoft SharePoint are both popular Microsoft products used for managing and organizing data. However, they have distinct differences in terms of functionality and purpose.

  1. Data Structure and Organization: Microsoft Access is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that allows users to create and manage databases with structured tables, queries, forms, and reports. On the other hand, Microsoft SharePoint is a web-based collaboration and document management platform that focuses on storing and sharing information in a more unstructured manner, emphasizing document libraries and lists.

  2. Scalability and Collaboration: Microsoft Access is primarily designed for single-user or small team usage, with limitations in terms of scalability and concurrent access. In contrast, Microsoft SharePoint is built for enterprise-level collaboration, supporting large teams and accommodating simultaneous access by multiple users. It provides version control, permission settings, and workflow management, making it suitable for collaboration on projects and documents.

  3. Customization and Extensibility: Microsoft Access allows users to create and customize databases using its built-in user interface and Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) coding. It offers a higher level of flexibility and customizability, enabling users to create complex forms, reports, and macros. On the other hand, SharePoint offers a more limited level of customization through web parts, workflows, and various add-ons. Its focus is more on providing a standardized and consistent user interface across the platform.

  4. Data Accessibility and Connectivity: Microsoft Access databases are typically stored on local machines or shared network drives, limiting accessibility and requiring users to have Access installed. SharePoint, on the other hand, is web-based and can be accessed from anywhere with an internet connection. It offers browser-based access to documents and data, making it more suitable for remote and distributed teams.

  5. Security and Compliance: Microsoft Access provides basic security features such as user-level permissions, password encryption, and database password protection. However, it lacks the advanced security and compliance capabilities offered by SharePoint. SharePoint includes more robust security features like centralized user authentication, granular permission settings, and integration with Active Directory. It also conforms to various compliance standards such as HIPAA and GDPR.

  6. Workflow Automation and Integration: Microsoft Access allows users to create basic macros and automate simple tasks within the database itself. In contrast, SharePoint has more advanced workflow capabilities, allowing users to create complex workflows and automate business processes across multiple documents and lists. SharePoint also integrates with other Microsoft products like Outlook, Excel, and Power Automate (formerly Flow) for seamless data integration and process automation.

In summary, Microsoft Access is a desktop-based database management system focused on structured data management, while Microsoft SharePoint is a web-based collaboration platform that emphasizes unstructured data organization and team collaboration. SharePoint offers scalability, customization, and enterprise-level features, making it more suitable for larger teams and complex projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft Access
Microsoft Access

It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.

It is an easy-to-use tool for creating business applications, from templates or from scratch. With its rich and intuitive design tools, it can help you create appealing and highly functional applications in a minimal amount of time.

Authentication; Business Intelligence; Web Content Management
rich and intuitive design tools; highly functional applications in a minimal amount of time
Statistics
Stacks
442
Stacks
83
Followers
314
Followers
87
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Great online support
  • 1
    Secure
  • 1
    Stable Platform
  • 1
    Seamless intergration with MS Office
  • 1
    Perfect version control
Cons
  • 2
    Rigid, hard to add external applicaions
  • 1
    User interface. Steep learning curve, old-fashioned
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jira
Jira
Slack
Slack
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Azure SQL Database
Azure SQL Database

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SharePoint, Microsoft Access?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Google Drive

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Dropbox

Dropbox

Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase