Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

MessagePack

50
78
+ 1
1
Protobuf

3.6K
380
+ 1
0
Add tool

MessagePack vs Protobuf: What are the differences?

Both MessagePack and Protobuf are popular data interchange formats that offer compact and efficient serialization and deserialization of structured data. Let's explore the key differences between MessagePack and Protobuf.

  1. Data Representation: MessagePack uses a binary format for data representation, whereas Protobuf uses a combination of binary and textual formats.

  2. Schema Definition: MessagePack does not require a schema definition for serialization and deserialization, making it more flexible for loosely structured data. On the other hand, Protobuf requires a strict schema definition using a .proto file, enforcing a structured and strongly typed data model.

  3. Compatibility: MessagePack supports backward and forward compatibility out of the box, allowing for seamless communication between different versions or implementations of the data format. In contrast, Protobuf requires careful management of schema evolution and versioning to ensure compatibility.

  4. Language Support: MessagePack has extensive language support, with libraries available for many programming languages. Protobuf also has broad language support, but it is primarily focused on the languages supported by Google, such as Java, C++, and Python.

  5. Serialization Efficiency: MessagePack provides a highly efficient binary serialization format, resulting in smaller message sizes. Protobuf also offers efficient serialization but may have slightly larger message sizes due to the inclusion of field tags and length prefixes.

  6. Rich Feature Set: Protobuf offers a richer feature set compared to MessagePack, with support for features like default values, nested messages, and enums. MessagePack, on the other hand, provides a more minimalistic approach, focusing on simplicity and performance.

In summary, MessagePack and Protobuf differ significantly in data representation, schema definition requirements, compatibility, language support, serialization efficiency, and feature sets. Understanding these differences can help you make an informed decision on which data format to choose for your specific application needs.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of MessagePack
Pros of Protobuf
  • 1
    Lightweight
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is MessagePack?

    It is an efficient binary serialization format. It lets you exchange data among multiple languages like JSON. But it's faster and smaller. Small integers are encoded into a single byte, and typical short strings require only one extra byte in addition to the strings themselves.

    What is Protobuf?

    Protocol buffers are Google's language-neutral, platform-neutral, extensible mechanism for serializing structured data – think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use MessagePack?
    What companies use Protobuf?
    See which teams inside your own company are using MessagePack or Protobuf.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with MessagePack?
    What tools integrate with Protobuf?

    Blog Posts

    Jun 6 2019 at 5:11PM

    AppSignal

    RedisRubyKafka+9
    15
    1633
    What are some alternatives to MessagePack and Protobuf?
    JSON
    JavaScript Object Notation is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write. It is easy for machines to parse and generate. It is based on a subset of the JavaScript Programming Language.
    Avro
    It is a row-oriented remote procedure call and data serialization framework developed within Apache's Hadoop project. It uses JSON for defining data types and protocols, and serializes data in a compact binary format.
    gRPC
    gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...
    Apache Thrift
    The Apache Thrift software framework, for scalable cross-language services development, combines a software stack with a code generation engine to build services that work efficiently and seamlessly between C++, Java, Python, PHP, Ruby, Erlang, Perl, Haskell, C#, Cocoa, JavaScript, Node.js, Smalltalk, OCaml and Delphi and other languages.
    Serde
    It is a framework for serializing and deserializing Rust data structures efficiently and generically. The ecosystem consists of data structures that know how to serialize and deserialize themselves along with data formats that know how to serialize and deserialize other things. It provides the layer by which these two groups interact with each other, allowing any supported data structure to be serialized and deserialized using any supported data format.
    See all alternatives