MediaWiki vs Stonly Knowledge Base

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

MediaWiki

175
87
+ 1
0
Stonly Knowledge Base

5
6
+ 1
0
Add tool

MediaWiki vs Stonly Knowledge Base: What are the differences?

Key Differences between MediaWiki and Stonly Knowledge Base

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between MediaWiki and Stonly Knowledge Base. Both platforms serve as knowledge bases for storing and organizing information, but they have distinct features and functionalities.

  1. Ease of Use: MediaWiki, the platform behind Wikipedia, is a powerful and feature-rich wiki software that offers extensive customization and flexibility. It is ideal for advanced users who require complex features like templates and extensions. On the other hand, Stonly Knowledge Base focuses on simplicity and usability, providing a user-friendly interface that allows non-technical users to create and manage knowledge base articles easily.

  2. Collaboration and Workflow: MediaWiki offers robust collaboration features, including user permissions, version control, and discussion pages, making it suitable for large-scale, collaborative projects. It allows users to track edits, resolve conflicts, and maintain a detailed history of changes. In contrast, Stonly Knowledge Base is designed with a single user in mind and lacks advanced collaborative features.

  3. Customization and Extensibility: MediaWiki provides extensive customization options through its open-source nature. Users can modify the software's source code, develop custom extensions, and tailor the interface to fit their specific needs. Stonly Knowledge Base, on the other hand, prioritizes simplicity and limits customization to maintain ease of use, offering a more streamlined and uniform experience.

  4. Content Presentation: MediaWiki focuses on providing a comprehensive wiki experience, with features like categories, templates, and advanced search capabilities. Its pages often contain rich media, complex formatting, and structured content. Stonly Knowledge Base, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and readability, offering a clean and minimalist interface with a focus on text-based articles.

  5. Integration and APIs: MediaWiki offers a wide range of integration options and has a well-documented API, making it suitable for integrating with other software systems and automating certain processes. Stonly Knowledge Base, while lacking some advanced integration options, offers a modern API and Zapier integration, allowing users to connect their knowledge base with other applications.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: MediaWiki is an open-source software, available for free under the GNU General Public License, making it a cost-effective solution for organizations with technical teams capable of managing and maintaining the software. Stonly Knowledge Base, on the other hand, offers various pricing tiers, including a free plan, and is hosted and maintained by the provider, making it a more accessible option for non-technical users and smaller teams.

In summary, MediaWiki offers extensive customization, collaboration features, and a comprehensive wiki experience suitable for advanced users, whereas Stonly Knowledge Base prioritizes simplicity, ease of use, and accessibility for non-technical users and smaller teams.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
No Stats

What is MediaWiki?

It is a free server-based software. It is an extremely powerful, scalable software and a feature-rich wiki implementation that uses PHP to process and display data stored in a database, such as MySQL.

What is Stonly Knowledge Base?

It has reimagined the knowledge base to make it powerful and present. It’s KB is full of interactive, step-by-step guides that are a more effective way to share information.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use MediaWiki?
What companies use Stonly Knowledge Base?
See which teams inside your own company are using MediaWiki or Stonly Knowledge Base.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with MediaWiki?
What tools integrate with Stonly Knowledge Base?
What are some alternatives to MediaWiki and Stonly Knowledge Base?
Microsoft SharePoint
It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.
WordPress
The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
Confluence
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
DokuWiki
It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.
Drupal
Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.
See all alternatives