StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. Apache Maven vs SVN (Subversion)

Apache Maven vs SVN (Subversion)

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Stacks3.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes414
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks2.8K
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Stacks791
Followers629
Votes43
GitHub Stars614
Forks188

Apache Maven vs SVN (Subversion): What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Maven and SVN (Subversion) are both popular tools in the software development industry. Maven is a build automation and project management tool, while SVN is a version control system. While both tools have similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Dependency management: Maven is primarily used for managing project dependencies. It uses a declarative approach where dependencies are defined in a project's pom.xml file. Maven automatically downloads and includes the required dependencies, making it easier to manage and update dependencies across different projects. On the other hand, SVN does not provide built-in dependency management capabilities.

  2. Version control: SVN, being a version control system, allows developers to track changes made to files and collaborate on code. It provides features like version history, branching, merging, and conflict resolution. Maven, on the other hand, does not have built-in version control capabilities. It focuses more on project build and dependency management rather than tracking changes in code.

  3. Centralized vs Distributed: SVN follows a centralized version control model, where the codebase is stored in a central repository. Developers need to explicitly update and commit changes to the central repository. In contrast, Maven does not have a centralized codebase. It is a build tool that retrieves dependencies from remote repositories and builds the project locally.

  4. Workflow: SVN has a linear workflow where developers check out code, make changes, and commit them back to the repository. It is more suitable for projects with a strict linear development process. On the other hand, Maven follows a build-centric workflow where developers focus on defining the project structure, dependencies, and build settings. It helps automate the build process and simplifies project management.

  5. Integration: Maven is often integrated with other tools and frameworks in the Java ecosystem. It seamlessly integrates with IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ, making it easier for developers to work with Maven-based projects. SVN, on the other hand, can be integrated with various IDEs and development environments, allowing developers to perform version control operations directly within their preferred tools.

  6. Usage: Maven is widely used for Java projects and is a de facto standard in the Java community. It provides a standardized way of managing dependencies and building Java projects. SVN, on the other hand, is a popular version control system used in various industries and supports multiple programming languages.

In summary, Apache Maven focuses on project build automation and dependency management, while SVN is a version control system for tracking changes in code. Maven is best suited for Java projects and has a centralized dependency management approach, while SVN is suitable for projects that require version control and collaboration features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Maven
Apache Maven
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

Simple project setup that follows best practices - get a new project or module started in seconds;Consistent usage across all projects means no ramp up time for new developers coming onto a project;Superior dependency management including automatic updating, dependency closures (also known as transitive dependencies);Able to easily work with multiple projects at the same time;A large and growing repository of libraries and metadata to use out of the box, and arrangements in place with the largest Open Source projects for real-time availability of their latest releases;Extensible, with the ability to easily write plugins in Java or scripting languages;Instant access to new features with little or no extra configuration;Ant tasks for dependency management and deployment outside of Maven
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Stars
614
GitHub Forks
2.8K
GitHub Forks
188
Stacks
3.4K
Stacks
791
Followers
1.7K
Followers
629
Votes
414
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
Cons
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Simple code versioning
  • 5
    User/Access Management
  • 3
    Complicated code versionioning by Subversion
  • 2
    Free
Cons
  • 7
    Branching and tagging use tons of disk space

What are some alternatives to Apache Maven, SVN (Subversion)?

Git

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Pants

Pants

Pants is a build system for Java, Scala and Python. It works particularly well for a source code repository that contains many distinct projects.

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM

Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.

Pijul

Pijul

Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.

JitPack

JitPack

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

SBT

SBT

It is similar to Java's Maven and Ant. Its main features are: Native support for compiling Scala code and integrating with many Scala test frameworks.

Buck

Buck

Buck encourages the creation of small, reusable modules consisting of code and resources, and supports a variety of languages on many platforms.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana