StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Martini vs OSGi

Martini vs OSGi

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Martini
Martini
Stacks16
Followers37
Votes15
GitHub Stars11.6K
Forks1.1K
OSGi
OSGi
Stacks78
Followers118
Votes10

Martini vs OSGi: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Martini and OSGi. Both Martini and OSGi are frameworks used in application development, but they have distinct features and purposes.

  1. Ease of use: Martini is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It has a minimalistic design that allows developers to quickly get started with building applications. On the other hand, OSGi is more complex and requires a deeper understanding of its architecture and concepts to effectively utilize its features.

  2. Modularity: OSGi is primarily focused on providing a modular architecture for applications. It allows developers to divide their applications into smaller, reusable components called bundles. These bundles can be individually installed, started, and stopped, providing better flexibility and maintainability. In contrast, Martini does not have built-in support for modularity like OSGi.

  3. Dynamicity: OSGi supports dynamic rebinding of components at runtime. This means that components can be added, removed, or replaced in a running OSGi application without requiring a restart. Martini, on the other hand, does not have native support for dynamicity and requires a restart to reflect any changes made to the application.

  4. Service Oriented Architecture (SOA): OSGi has built-in support for a service-oriented architecture. It provides a service registry where components can register and discover services. This promotes loose coupling and enables easier integration of different components. In contrast, Martini does not have a dedicated service registry and does not directly support a service-oriented architecture.

  5. Scalability: OSGi is designed to be highly scalable, making it suitable for large-scale enterprise applications. It allows developers to dynamically install and update bundles, making it easier to add new features or fix issues without disrupting the entire application. Martini, on the other hand, may not scale as well as OSGi due to its lack of modularity and dynamicity features.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: OSGi has a larger and more mature community compared to Martini. It has a wide range of available libraries, tools, and frameworks that can be used alongside OSGi to enhance application development. Martini, being a relatively newer framework, may have a smaller community and a limited ecosystem.

In summary, Martini and OSGi differ in terms of ease of use, modularity, dynamicity, support for service-oriented architecture, scalability, and community/ecosystem. While Martini offers simplicity and ease of use, OSGi provides a more advanced and modular approach to application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Martini
Martini
OSGi
OSGi

Martini is a powerful package for quickly writing modular web applications/services in Golang.

It is a Java framework for developing and deploying modular software programs and libraries. It provides a vendor-independent, standards-based approach to modularizing Java software applications and infrastructure.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16
Stacks
78
Followers
37
Followers
118
Votes
15
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Go
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Modular
  • 1
    Flexible Routing
Pros
  • 2
    Component-based platform
  • 2
    Componentization of software modules
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Dynamically deploy your code at anytime w/o downtime
  • 1
    Remote management
Cons
  • 1
    Bound to eclipse
Integrations
Golang
Golang
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Martini, OSGi?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase