StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Log Management
  5. Logback vs logagent

Logback vs logagent

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Logback
Logback
Stacks5.6K
Followers76
Votes0
Logagent
Logagent
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars390
Forks78

Logback vs logagent: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of logging, Logback and logagent are two popular options. Both serve the purpose of logging information in a system, but there are key differences between them that users should be aware of to make an informed decision on which one to use.

  1. Configuration Flexibility: Logback offers a wide range of configuration options, allowing users to fine-tune their logging settings to suit their specific needs. On the other hand, logagent provides a more streamlined approach to configuration, simplifying the process for users who want a more straightforward setup.

  2. Community Support: Logback has a large and active community of users and contributors, which means that users can easily find help, documentation, and resources online. In contrast, logagent's community may be smaller, leading to potentially fewer online resources and support options for users.

  3. Performance: Logback is known for its high performance, making it a preferred choice for systems that require logging with minimal impact on overall system performance. While logagent also offers good performance, it may not be as optimized for high-performance environments as Logback.

  4. Logging Features: Logback provides a rich set of logging features, including log rotation, log filtering, and custom log formats. In comparison, logagent may have a more limited set of logging features, which could be a consideration for users who require advanced logging capabilities.

  5. Compatibility: Logback is compatible with various logging frameworks and libraries, making it easier to integrate with existing systems and tools. On the other hand, logagent may have limitations in terms of compatibility with other logging systems, which could be a factor for users with specific integration requirements.

  6. Ease of Use: Logback is known for its user-friendly configuration and setup process, making it accessible to users of all levels of expertise. Logagent, while simpler in some aspects, may require more technical knowledge to leverage its full functionality, potentially posing a learning curve for novice users.

In Summary, Logback and logagent differ in terms of configuration flexibility, community support, performance, logging features, compatibility, and ease of use, providing users with distinct options based on their logging requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Logback
Logback
Logagent
Logagent

It is intended as a successor to the popular log4j project. It is divided into three modules, logback-core, logback-classic and logback-access. The logback-core module lays the groundwork for the other two modules, logback-classic natively implements the SLF4J API so that you can readily switch back and forth between logback and other logging frameworks and logback-access module integrates with Servlet containers, such as Tomcat and Jetty, to provide HTTP-access log functionality.

Open-source, light-weight data shipper with out of the box and extensible log parsing, on-disk buffering, secure transport and bulk indexing.

-
Open source - Apache Licence; Log parsing; On-disk buffering; Bulk indexing; Low memory overhead; Elasticsearch integration; Log routing; Container/Docker/Kubernetes integration; Log structure parsing; Log enrichment; Log rotation; Secure and reliable data transfer; Masking sensitive data; Syslog integration; Heroku integration; CloudFoundry integration; Filtering and aggregation; Two-way SSL auth
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
390
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
78
Stacks
5.6K
Stacks
4
Followers
76
Followers
5
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
Node.js
Node.js
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
JavaScript
JavaScript
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Logback, Logagent?

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Sematext

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Fluentd

Fluentd

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

ELK

ELK

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

Sumo Logic

Sumo Logic

Cloud-based machine data analytics platform that enables companies to proactively identify availability and performance issues in their infrastructure, improve their security posture and enhance application rollouts. Companies using Sumo Logic reduce their mean-time-to-resolution by 50% and can save hundreds of thousands of dollars, annually. Customers include Netflix, Medallia, Orange, and GoGo Inflight.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana