Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

listmonk

10
34
+ 1
0
Ruby

42.2K
21.8K
+ 1
4K
Add tool

listmonk vs Ruby: What are the differences?

Developers describe listmonk as "Self-hosted newsletter + mailing list manager". It is a standalone, self-hosted, newsletter and mailing list manager. It is fast, feature-rich, and packed into a single binary. It uses a PostgreSQL database as its data store. On the other hand, Ruby is detailed as "A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity". Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

listmonk and Ruby are primarily classified as "Email Marketing" and "Languages" tools respectively.

listmonk and Ruby are both open source tools. It seems that Ruby with 16K GitHub stars and 4.29K forks on GitHub has more adoption than listmonk with 2.68K GitHub stars and 90 GitHub forks.

Decisions about listmonk and Ruby
Andrew Carpenter
Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC · | 16 upvotes · 444.1K views

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

See more
Thomas Miller
Talent Co-Ordinator at Tessian · | 16 upvotes · 261K views

In December we successfully flipped around half a billion monthly API requests from our Ruby on Rails application to some new Python 3 applications. Our Head of Engineering has written a great article as to why we decided to transition from Ruby on Rails to Python 3! Read more about it in the link below.

See more
Mike Fiedler
Enterprise Architect at Warby Parker · | 3 upvotes · 256.4K views

When I was evaluating languages to write this app in, I considered either Python or JavaScript at the time. I find Ruby very pleasant to read and write, and the Ruby community has built out a wide variety of test tools and approaches, helping e deliver better software faster. Along with Rails, and the Ruby-first Heroku support, this was an easy decision.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of listmonk
Pros of Ruby
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 608
      Programme friendly
    • 538
      Quick to develop
    • 492
      Great community
    • 469
      Productivity
    • 432
      Simplicity
    • 274
      Open source
    • 235
      Meta-programming
    • 208
      Powerful
    • 157
      Blocks
    • 140
      Powerful one-liners
    • 70
      Flexible
    • 59
      Easy to learn
    • 52
      Easy to start
    • 42
      Maintainability
    • 38
      Lambdas
    • 31
      Procs
    • 21
      Fun to write
    • 19
      Diverse web frameworks
    • 14
      Reads like English
    • 10
      Makes me smarter and happier
    • 9
      Rails
    • 9
      Elegant syntax
    • 8
      Very Dynamic
    • 7
      Matz
    • 6
      Programmer happiness
    • 5
      Object Oriented
    • 4
      Elegant code
    • 4
      Friendly
    • 4
      Generally fun but makes you wanna cry sometimes
    • 4
      Fun and useful
    • 3
      There are so many ways to make it do what you want
    • 3
      Easy packaging and modules
    • 2
      Primitive types can be tampered with

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of listmonk
    Cons of Ruby
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 7
        Memory hog
      • 7
        Really slow if you're not really careful
      • 3
        Nested Blocks can make code unreadable
      • 2
        Encouraging imperative programming
      • 1
        No type safety, so it requires copious testing
      • 1
        Ambiguous Syntax, such as function parentheses

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is listmonk?

      It is a standalone, self-hosted, newsletter and mailing list manager. It is fast, feature-rich, and packed into a single binary. It uses a PostgreSQL database as its data store.

      What is Ruby?

      Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use listmonk?
      What companies use Ruby?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with listmonk?
      What tools integrate with Ruby?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Nov 20 2019 at 3:38AM

      OneSignal

      PostgreSQLRedisRuby+8
      9
      4908
      Oct 24 2019 at 7:43PM

      AppSignal

      JavaScriptNode.jsJava+8
      5
      1071
      Jun 6 2019 at 5:11PM

      AppSignal

      RedisRubyKafka+9
      16
      1795
      GitHubDockerReact+17
      42
      38387
      What are some alternatives to listmonk and Ruby?
      JavaScript
      JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
      Python
      Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
      Node.js
      Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
      HTML5
      HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.
      PHP
      Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.
      See all alternatives