StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. LevelDB vs NeDB

LevelDB vs NeDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LevelDB
LevelDB
Stacks108
Followers111
Votes0
GitHub Stars38.3K
Forks8.1K
NeDB
NeDB
Stacks37
Followers85
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.6K
Forks1.0K

LevelDB vs NeDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between LevelDB and NeDB, two popular database management systems.

  1. Scalability: One key difference between LevelDB and NeDB is in terms of scalability. LevelDB is designed to handle a large amount of data and can scale horizontally across multiple machines. It is a distributed database that allows for partitioning of data across multiple servers, enabling high availability and fault tolerance. On the other hand, NeDB is an embedded database that is not as scalable as LevelDB. It is primarily designed for single-machine deployments and does not support horizontal scaling.

  2. Performance: Another important difference is in terms of performance. LevelDB is known for its high performance and is optimized for fast read and write operations. It utilizes a log-structured merge-tree (LSM-tree) data structure, which provides efficient disk write operations and allows for quick read accesses. NeDB, on the other hand, is not as performant as LevelDB. It uses a traditional B-tree data structure, which can be slower for certain types of operations compared to the LSM-tree used by LevelDB.

  3. Querying Capabilities: When it comes to querying capabilities, LevelDB and NeDB differ significantly. LevelDB is a key-value store and does not provide a built-in query language or advanced querying capabilities. It is primarily designed for simple key-value retrievals and does not support complex queries. NeDB, on the other hand, provides a querying API that allows for more advanced query operations, including filtering, sorting, and joining of data. It offers a MongoDB-inspired query syntax that enables developers to perform complex queries on the data.

  4. Data Persistence: LevelDB and NeDB also differ in terms of data persistence. LevelDB is an on-disk database that persists data to disk, ensuring durability and reliability. It uses a write-ahead log to ensure that data modifications are durable and can survive system failures. NeDB, on the other hand, is an in-memory database that stores data in memory and does not provide built-in data persistence. It is primarily used for temporary data storage and does not guarantee durability in case of system failures.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: LevelDB and NeDB also vary in terms of their community and ecosystem. LevelDB is developed and maintained by Google and has a larger community of users and contributors. It has been extensively tested and is used in production by several large-scale applications. NeDB, on the other hand, is an open-source project that has a smaller community compared to LevelDB. It may have limited resources and documentation available compared to LevelDB.

  6. Platform Compatibility: Another important difference between LevelDB and NeDB is their platform compatibility. LevelDB is designed to be platform-independent and is available for various programming languages, including C++, Java, Python, and more. It can be easily integrated into different types of applications and frameworks. NeDB, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Node.js applications and may not be as compatible with other programming languages or platforms.

In summary, LevelDB is a highly scalable and performant database that is suitable for large-scale applications requiring high-performance data access and distributed deployments. NeDB, on the other hand, is a more lightweight and simpler database that is primarily designed for small-scale applications running on a single machine and requiring advanced querying capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LevelDB
LevelDB
NeDB
NeDB

It is a fast key-value storage library written at Google that provides an ordered mapping from string keys to string values. It has been ported to a variety of Unix-based systems, macOS, Windows, and Android.

Embedded persistent or in memory database for Node.js, nw.js, Electron and browsers, 100% JavaScript, no binary dependency. API is a subset of MongoDB's and it's plenty fast.

Simple key-value stores with Go, C++, Node.js and more!
In-memory datastore; Persistent datastore;Equivalent of a MongoDB collection; JavaScript database
Statistics
GitHub Stars
38.3K
GitHub Stars
13.6K
GitHub Forks
8.1K
GitHub Forks
1.0K
Stacks
108
Stacks
37
Followers
111
Followers
85
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Java
Java
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS
Electron
Electron
Node.js
Node.js
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to LevelDB, NeDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase