StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Deployment As A Service
  5. Laravel Forge vs Vapor

Laravel Forge vs Vapor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge
Stacks233
Followers273
Votes4
Vapor
Vapor
Stacks117
Followers217
Votes65

Laravel Forge vs Vapor: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Workflow: Laravel Forge focuses on providing a seamless and user-friendly deployment workflow for Laravel applications. It offers a straightforward interface and allows developers to easily manage and deploy their applications to various servers and cloud providers. On the other hand, Laravel Vapor is specifically designed for deploying Laravel applications on AWS Lambda and AWS Fargate. It abstracts away the underlying infrastructure and allows developers to focus solely on their applications, without having to manage the servers or scaling configurations.
  2. Server Management: Laravel Forge provides built-in server management features, allowing developers to easily provision, monitor, and scale their servers. It offers a simple user interface for managing servers, SSL certificates, databases, and more. On the other hand, with Laravel Vapor, developers do not have to worry about server management at all, as it fully abstracts away the server infrastructure. AWS takes care of provisioning and managing the serverless environment, making it more convenient and scalable for developers.
  3. Pricing Structure: Laravel Forge offers a subscription-based pricing structure, where users pay a fixed monthly fee based on the number of servers they manage. The pricing includes the server management features and support from Laravel. On the other hand, with Laravel Vapor, users pay based on the actual usage of AWS Lambda and AWS Fargate resources. This pay-as-you-go model allows for more cost-effective scaling, as users only pay for what they use.
  4. Serverless Architecture: Laravel Forge deploys applications on traditional servers, while Laravel Vapor leverages a serverless architecture using AWS Lambda and AWS Fargate. This means that with Laravel Vapor, the application is automatically scaled and managed by AWS, without the need for developers to manually configure and scale servers. This serverless approach provides more agility and flexibility for handling traffic spikes and minimizing wastage of server resources.
  5. Auto Scaling and High Availability: Laravel Forge supports auto scaling to a certain extent, allowing developers to scale their servers vertically by adding more resources. However, it does not provide built-in support for horizontal scaling or high availability. On the other hand, Laravel Vapor takes full advantage of AWS auto scaling and high availability features. It automatically scales up or down based on traffic demands and ensures the application is distributed across multiple availability zones, improving its resilience and fault tolerance.
  6. Infrastructure Management: Laravel Forge simplifies infrastructure management by abstracting away the complexities of server provisioning and configuration. It provides an intuitive interface for managing servers, databases, SSL certificates, and other essential components. In contrast, Laravel Vapor takes infrastructure management one step further by abstracting away the entire server infrastructure. It leverages AWS services like AWS Lambda and AWS Fargate, allowing developers to focus solely on code and application development without worrying about infrastructure management.

In summary, Laravel Forge focuses on providing a user-friendly deployment workflow with server management features, while Laravel Vapor abstracts away the server infrastructure and provides a serverless architecture on AWS, with auto scaling and high availability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Laravel Forge
Laravel Forge
Vapor
Vapor

Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.

Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.

-
Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
Stacks
233
Stacks
117
Followers
273
Followers
217
Votes
4
Votes
65
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Simply to use
Cons
  • 2
    Monthly subscription
Pros
  • 13
    Fast
  • 11
    Swift
  • 10
    Type-safe
  • 6
    Great for apis
  • 5
    Asynchronous
Cons
  • 1
    Server side swift is still in its infancy
  • 1
    Not as much support available.
Integrations
No integrations available
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Laravel Forge, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot