StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. LambdaTest vs Selenium

LambdaTest vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Stacks556
Followers198
Votes204

LambdaTest vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction

LambdaTest and Selenium are both popular tools used for automated website testing. While both tools serve the same purpose, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other. In this analysis, we will explore the main differences between LambdaTest and Selenium.

  1. Pricing Model: One major difference between LambdaTest and Selenium is their pricing models. LambdaTest offers a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed monthly or annual fee to access the platform's features and services. On the other hand, Selenium is an open-source tool that is available for free to users, making it a cost-effective choice for businesses on a tight budget.

  2. Platform Coverage: Another key difference between LambdaTest and Selenium is their platform coverage. LambdaTest provides a cloud-based testing platform that supports a wide range of operating systems, browsers, and mobile devices, allowing users to test their websites across different platforms easily. Selenium, being an open-source tool, does not offer the same level of platform coverage out of the box and may require additional configuration and setup to test on different platforms.

  3. Built-in Integrations: LambdaTest provides built-in integrations with popular project management and collaboration tools such as Jira, Asana, Trello, and Slack. This allows users to seamlessly integrate their testing processes with their existing workflows and ensures smooth communication between team members. Selenium, on the other hand, does not provide these built-in integrations, necessitating users to rely on third-party plugins or custom development to achieve similar functionality.

  4. Parallel Testing: Parallel testing is a feature that allows users to execute multiple tests simultaneously, reducing the overall testing time. LambdaTest offers built-in parallel testing capabilities, allowing users to execute tests across multiple browsers, operating systems, and devices in parallel. However, Selenium does not offer parallel testing functionality out of the box and requires additional setup and configuration to achieve parallel testing.

  5. Documentation and Support: LambdaTest provides detailed documentation, tutorials, and dedicated customer support to help users get started and troubleshoot any issues they may encounter during their testing process. Selenium, being an open-source tool, relies on community support and documentation, which may not be as comprehensive or user-friendly as the dedicated support offered by LambdaTest.

  6. Scalability: LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform that offers scalable infrastructure, allowing users to scale their testing efforts according to their needs. This means that users can easily increase or decrease their testing resources as required, ensuring optimal performance and cost-efficiency. Selenium, being an open-source tool, does not provide the same level of scalability and may require additional infrastructure setup and management to accommodate high-volume testing.

In summary, LambdaTest offers a subscription-based pricing model, provides extensive platform coverage, offers built-in integrations, supports parallel testing, provides comprehensive documentation and support, and offers scalability, making it a user-friendly and versatile choice for automated website testing. Selenium, on the other hand, is an open-source tool that is cost-effective, requires additional configuration for platform coverage, lacks built-in integrations, does not offer parallel testing functionality out of the box, relies on community support, and may require additional setup for scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Selenium, LambdaTest

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
LambdaTest
LambdaTest

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

-
Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
556
Followers
12.6K
Followers
198
Votes
527
Votes
204
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
Pros
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
Cons
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Limited device support
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
Integrations
No integrations available
Zoho Bugtracker
Zoho Bugtracker
GitLab
GitLab
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
RSpec
RSpec
Jira
Jira
PractiTest
PractiTest
AngularJS
AngularJS
JUnit
JUnit
TestCafe
TestCafe
Appium
Appium

What are some alternatives to Selenium, LambdaTest?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Autify

Autify

It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana