StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. LambdaTest vs Sauce Labs

LambdaTest vs Sauce Labs

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
Stacks314
Followers435
Votes439
LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Stacks556
Followers198
Votes204

LambdaTest vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?

Introduction: LambdaTest and Sauce Labs are two popular cloud-based testing platforms that offer a range of features and services for web and mobile application testing. While both platforms are designed to simplify and streamline the testing process, there are several key differences between LambdaTest and Sauce Labs.

  1. Browser and Device Coverage: LambdaTest provides a comprehensive range of 2000+ browsers and mobile devices for testing, including the latest and legacy versions. On the other hand, Sauce Labs offers a slightly smaller coverage with around 1000+ browsers and devices. This means that LambdaTest provides a wider range of testing options and ensures better compatibility with different user configurations.

  2. Real-time Testing Experience: LambdaTest provides a real-time testing experience, allowing users to interact with their applications in real-time during the testing process. This includes actions like performing mouse clicks, typing, scrolling, and form filling, providing a more accurate and realistic testing environment. Sauce Labs, on the other hand, focuses more on automated and scripted testing, which may not provide the same level of interactivity and real-time experience.

  3. Collaboration and Integrations: LambdaTest offers robust collaboration features, allowing users to invite team members, share testing results, and collaborate in real-time. It also integrates with popular project management and communication tools like Jira, Trello, Slack, and Microsoft Teams. Sauce Labs, though it offers some collaboration features, may not provide the same level of integration options, limiting the ease of collaboration and communication for teams.

  4. Pricing and Plans: LambdaTest offers more flexible and cost-effective pricing plans compared to Sauce Labs. LambdaTest offers both monthly and annual subscription options, allowing users to choose based on their project requirements and budget. Additionally, LambdaTest offers a free plan with limited features, making it suitable for small-scale testing requirements. Sauce Labs, on the other hand, primarily offers annual subscriptions and does not have a free plan, which may be a drawback for small businesses and individual testers.

  5. Automation and Continuous Integration: LambdaTest provides a robust automation framework with support for popular automation frameworks like Selenium, Cypress, and more. It also offers integrations with popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and CircleCI, enabling seamless integration into the development workflow. While Sauce Labs also offers automation capabilities, LambdaTest provides a more comprehensive solution with better integration options.

  6. Customer Support: LambdaTest is known for its excellent customer support, with a responsive customer service team available 24/7 through various channels. They are quick to respond to queries, provide detailed guidance, and actively seek feedback from users. Sauce Labs also offers customer support, but there have been some reports of slower response times and less personalized assistance.

In summary, LambdaTest offers a wider browser and device coverage, a more interactive testing experience, better collaboration and integration options, flexible pricing plans, comprehensive automation capabilities, and excellent customer support compared to Sauce Labs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sauce Labs, LambdaTest

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
LambdaTest
LambdaTest

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;
Statistics
Stacks
314
Stacks
556
Followers
435
Followers
198
Votes
439
Votes
204
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
Cons
  • 2
    Relatively slow
  • 2
    Expensive
Pros
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
Cons
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Limited device support
Integrations
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Appium
Appium
Jenkins
Jenkins
Selenium
Selenium
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
TeamCity
TeamCity
Applitools
Applitools
Bamboo
Bamboo
Zoho Bugtracker
Zoho Bugtracker
GitLab
GitLab
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
RSpec
RSpec
Jira
Jira
PractiTest
PractiTest
AngularJS
AngularJS
JUnit
JUnit
TestCafe
TestCafe
Appium
Appium

What are some alternatives to Sauce Labs, LambdaTest?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Autify

Autify

It is a software testing automation platform powered by AI. Autify helps in creating the Quality Assurance team to deliver the best version of their product in record time.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana