StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. LambdaTest vs Ranorex Studio

LambdaTest vs Ranorex Studio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Stacks556
Followers198
Votes204
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Stacks13
Followers13
Votes0

LambdaTest vs Ranorex Studio: What are the differences?

LambdaTest vs. Ranorex Studio:

LambdaTest and Ranorex Studio are two popular automation testing tools that offer distinct features catering to different testing needs. Below are the key differences between LambdaTest and Ranorex Studio:

  1. Browser Compatibility Testing: LambdaTest specializes in cross-browser testing, allowing users to test their web applications across a wide range of browsers and operating systems in real-time. On the other hand, Ranorex Studio focuses more on functional testing, offering a comprehensive set of tools for automated testing of desktop, web, and mobile applications.

  2. Cloud-Based vs. On-Premise Testing: LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform, providing users with the flexibility to perform testing on virtual machines hosted in the cloud. In contrast, Ranorex Studio is an on-premise testing tool that requires installation on a local machine for test automation and execution.

  3. Programming Languages Supported: LambdaTest supports multiple programming languages like Java, Python, Ruby, etc., making it convenient for testers with diverse programming skills. Ranorex Studio, on the other hand, primarily uses C# for test automation, which may be a limitation for testers more comfortable with other languages.

  4. Test Script Reusability: Ranorex Studio offers a robust test automation framework that emphasizes test script reusability, allowing testers to create modular test cases for efficient test maintenance. In comparison, LambdaTest focuses more on quick setup and execution of tests, without as much emphasis on test script organization and reusability.

  5. Integration with Third-Party Tools: Ranorex Studio provides seamless integration with various third-party tools and services like Jenkins, JIRA, Git, etc., enabling testers to incorporate test automation into their existing development workflows. LambdaTest also offers integrations with popular tools but may not have the same level of customization and extensibility as Ranorex Studio.

  6. Learning Curve: LambdaTest is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it suitable for testers of all skill levels, including beginners. On the other hand, Ranorex Studio, with its comprehensive feature set and advanced capabilities, may have a steeper learning curve, requiring more technical expertise to maximize its potential.

In Summary, LambdaTest excels in cross-browser testing and user-friendliness, while Ranorex Studio stands out for functional testing, test script reusability, and seamless integrations with third-party tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LambdaTest
LambdaTest
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

It empowers testers with a complete toolset for end-to-end testing of desktop, web and mobile applications in a single license. Automate tests on a Windows desktop, and then execute them locally or remotely, on real iOS or Android mobile devices or on simulators/emulators.

Selenium Web Automation; Cypress CLI; HyperExecute (70% faster then conventional selenium grid); Test at Scale; Customized Enterprise Solutions; Puppeteer Automation Testing; Playwright Automation Testing; TestCafe Automation Testing; Appium Automation Testing; Espresso Mobile App Testing; On Premise Selenium Grid; Real Time Browser Testing; Real Mobile App Testing; Local host web app testing; Automated Screenshot Generation; Smart Visual UI testing, Visual Regression Testing; Free Responsive testing with LT Browser;Smart Visual UI Testing;Testing Locally Hosted Pages: Lambda Tunnel;
Reliable object identification; Broad technology support; Easily maintainable repository; Easy for beginners, powerful for experts
Statistics
Stacks
556
Stacks
13
Followers
198
Followers
13
Votes
204
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
Cons
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Zoho Bugtracker
Zoho Bugtracker
GitLab
GitLab
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
RSpec
RSpec
Jira
Jira
PractiTest
PractiTest
AngularJS
AngularJS
JUnit
JUnit
TestCafe
TestCafe
Appium
Appium
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Safari
Safari
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to LambdaTest, Ranorex Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana