Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

LambdaTest

538
198
+ 1
204
Playwright

417
534
+ 1
76
Add tool

LambdaTest vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between LambdaTest and Playwright, focusing on their unique features and functionalities.

  1. Cross Browser Compatibility Testing: LambdaTest provides a cloud-based platform for cross-browser compatibility testing, allowing developers to test their web applications on a wide range of browsers and operating systems. On the other hand, Playwright is an open-source library that offers cross-browser automation testing, enabling developers to automate their web application tests across different web browsers.

  2. Supported Browsers: LambdaTest supports a comprehensive list of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Internet Explorer, and Opera. It also provides support for their older versions. Playwright, on the other hand, offers support for Chromium (Google Chrome), Firefox, and WebKit (Safari).

  3. Programming Language Support: LambdaTest supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, and PHP, allowing developers to write their tests in their preferred programming language. Playwright provides support for multiple programming languages as well, including JavaScript, TypeScript, and Python, providing flexibility and ease of use for developers.

  4. Parallel Testing: LambdaTest allows developers to perform parallel testing, which means running multiple tests simultaneously on different browsers and operating systems. This helps save time and improves the overall testing efficiency. Playwright also supports parallel testing, enabling developers to execute multiple tests in parallel, optimizing testing time and resources.

  5. Browser Contexts: LambdaTest provides support for multiple browser contexts, which allows developers to create isolated browser environments for testing. This enables testing scenarios such as multiple user logins or different sessions on the same browser. Playwright also offers browser contexts, providing developers with the ability to create separate instances of browser environments, ensuring isolated testing and avoiding interference between test cases.

  6. Flexibility and Customization: LambdaTest offers various features for flexibility and customization, such as custom profiles, network conditions, geolocation testing, and local testing. These features allow developers to simulate real-world scenarios and thoroughly test their web applications. Playwright provides flexibility by allowing developers to customize browser options, emulate various devices for mobile testing, and modify network conditions, ensuring comprehensive testing with desired configurations.

In Summary, LambdaTest and Playwright differ in terms of cross-browser compatibility testing, supported browsers, programming language support, parallel testing capabilities, browser contexts, and flexibility in customization.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of LambdaTest
Pros of Playwright
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 11
    Integration with Jira
  • 11
    Great support
  • 11
    Integration with GitHub
  • 10
    Integration with Trello
  • 10
    Clean UI and Easy to use
  • 10
    Integration with Slack
  • 10
    Integration with Asana
  • 8
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 8
    Integration with Hive
  • 8
    IE and Edge support
  • 6
    Local app testing
  • 6
    Multiple Browsers
  • 5
    Integration with Teamwork
  • 5
    Integration with VSTS
  • 4
    Real time testing feature is flawless
  • 3
    Selenium automation
  • 3
    Faster Speed
  • 3
    Up-to-date Browser collection
  • 2
    Robust Selenium Grid
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Chat Support
  • 13
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of LambdaTest
Cons of Playwright
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is LambdaTest?

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

What is Playwright?

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use LambdaTest?
What companies use Playwright?
See which teams inside your own company are using LambdaTest or Playwright.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with LambdaTest?
What tools integrate with Playwright?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to LambdaTest and Playwright?
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Sauce Labs
Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.
Karma
Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.
See all alternatives